• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Money
  • Pets
  • Moms
  • Style
  • Travel
  • Books
  • KLG & Hoda
  • Video
  • More
    • Comics & Games
    • Concert Series
    • Good News!
    • Hip2Save
    • Horoscope
    • Lotto
    • Photo Features
    • Relationships
    • Rossen Reports
    • Tech
    • Weather
  • Recommended: Budget brides save by buying canceled weddings
  • Recommended: So your kid wants a credit card. What do you do now?
  • Recommended: Great Recession will haunt millions into their retirement years, study finds
  • Recommended: Big Brother may not be watching, but your employer probably is


Life Inc. is about how the economy is affecting you: your life, your job, your family, your finances, your spending. Check us out on Facebook or follow us on Twitter.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • Advertise | AdChoices
    15
    Dec
    2011
    4:59am, EST

    'Dismal' prospects: 1 in 2 Americans are now poor or low income

    Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images, file

    Juan Morena sits on a Los Angeles, Calif., sidewalk as he waits for the St. Francis Center soup kitchen to open on Sept. 13.

     

    By Associated Press

    WASHINGTON - Squeezed by rising living costs, a record number of Americans — nearly 1 in 2 — have fallen into poverty or are scraping by on earnings that classify them as low income.

    The latest census data depict a middle class that's shrinking as unemployment stays high and the government's safety net frays. The new numbers follow years of stagnating wages for the middle class that have hurt millions of workers and families.


    "Safety net programs such as food stamps and tax credits kept poverty from rising even higher in 2010, but for many low-income families with work-related and medical expenses, they are considered too 'rich' to qualify," said Sheldon Danziger, a University of Michigan public policy professor who specializes in poverty.

    "The reality is that prospects for the poor and the near poor are dismal," he said. "If Congress and the states make further cuts, we can expect the number of poor and low-income families to rise for the next several years."

    • Study: 1 in 5 American children lives in poverty

    Congressional Republicans and Democrats are sparring over legislation that would renew a Social Security payroll tax cut, part of a year-end political showdown over economic priorities that could also trim unemployment benefits, freeze federal pay and reduce entitlement spending.

    Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, questioned whether some people classified as poor or low-income actually suffer material hardship. He said that while safety-net programs have helped many Americans, they have gone too far, citing poor people who live in decent-size homes, drive cars and own wide-screen TVs.

    With nearly 14 million Americans unemployed, a new child welfare study finds one in five children are living in poverty. Nearly one in three live in homes where no parent works full-time year-round. NBC's Chris Jansing reports.

    "There's no doubt the recession has thrown a lot of people out of work and incomes have fallen," Rector said. "As we come out of recession, it will be important that these programs promote self-sufficiency rather than dependence and encourage people to look for work."

    Mayors in 29 cities say more than 1 in 4 people needing emergency food assistance did not receive it. Many middle-class Americans are dropping below the low-income threshold — roughly $45,000 for a family of four — because of pay cuts, a forced reduction of work hours or a spouse losing a job. Housing and child-care costs are consuming up to half of a family's income.

    States in the South and West had the highest shares of low-income families, including Arizona, New Mexico and South Carolina, which have scaled back or eliminated aid programs for the needy. By raw numbers, such families were most numerous in California and Texas, each with more than 1 million.

    The struggling Americans include Zenobia Bechtol, 18, in Austin, Texas, who earns minimum wage as a part-time pizza delivery driver. Bechtol and her 7-month-old baby were recently evicted from their bedbug-infested apartment after her boyfriend, an electrician, lost his job in the sluggish economy.

    After an 18-month job search, Bechtol's boyfriend now works as a waiter and the family of three is temporarily living with her mother.

    "We're paying my mom $200 a month for rent, and after diapers and formula and gas for work, we barely have enough money to spend," said Bechtol, a high school graduate who wants to go to college. "If it weren't for food stamps and other government money for families who need help, we wouldn't have been able to survive."

    • Major CEOs foresee no pickup in hiring

    About 97.3 million Americans fall into a low-income category, commonly defined as those earning between 100 and 199 percent of the poverty level, based on a new supplemental measure by the Census Bureau that is designed to provide a fuller picture of poverty. Together with the 49.1 million who fall below the poverty line and are counted as poor, they number 146.4 million, or 48 percent of the U.S. population. That's up by 4 million from 2009, the earliest numbers for the newly developed poverty measure.

    The new measure of poverty takes into account medical, commuting and other living costs. Doing that helped push the number of people below 200 percent of the poverty level up from 104 million, or 1 in 3 Americans, that was officially reported in September.

    Broken down by age, children were most likely to be poor or low-income — about 57 percent — followed by seniors over 65. By race and ethnicity, Hispanics topped the list at 73 percent, followed by blacks, Asians and non-Hispanic whites.

    Even by traditional measures, many working families are hurting.

    • We are the median: Mom and son scrimp and plan to get by

    Following the recession that began in late 2007, the share of working families who are low income has risen for three straight years to 31.2 percent, or 10.2 million. That proportion is the highest in at least a decade, up from 27 percent in 2002, according to a new analysis by the Working Poor Families Project and the Population Reference Bureau, a nonprofit research group based in Washington.

    Among low-income families, about one-third were considered poor while the remainder — 6.9 million — earned income just above the poverty line. Many states phase out eligibility for food stamps, Medicaid, tax credit and other government aid programs for low-income Americans as they approach 200 percent of the poverty level.

    The majority of low-income families — 62 percent — spent more than one-third of their earnings on housing, surpassing a common guideline for what is considered affordable. By some census surveys, child-care costs consume close to another one-fifth.

    Shrinking paychecks
    Paychecks for low-income families are shrinking. The inflation-adjusted average earnings for the bottom 20 percent of families have fallen from $16,788 in 1979 to just under $15,000, and earnings for the next 20 percent have remained flat at $37,000. In contrast, higher-income brackets had significant wage growth since 1979, with earnings for the top 5 percent of families climbing 64 percent to more than $313,000.

    A survey of 29 cities conducted by the U.S. Conference of Mayors being released Thursday points to a gloomy outlook for those on the lower end of the income scale.

    • Working-age poor population highest since '60s

    Many mayors cited the challenges of meeting increased demands for food assistance, expressing particular concern about possible cuts to federal programs such as food stamps and WIC, which assists low-income pregnant women and mothers. Unemployment led the list of causes of hunger in cities, followed by poverty, low wages and high housing costs.

    Across the 29 cities, about 27 percent of people needing emergency food aid did not receive it. Kansas City, Mo., Nashville, Tenn., Sacramento, Calif., and Trenton, N.J., were among the cities that pointed to increases in the cost of food and declining food donations, while Mayor Michael McGinn in Seattle cited an unexpected spike in food requests from immigrants and refugees, particularly from Somalia, Burma and Bhutan.

    Among those requesting emergency food assistance, 51 percent were in families, 26 percent were employed, 19 percent were elderly and 11 percent were homeless.

    "People who never thought they would need food are in need of help," said Mayor Sly James of Kansas City, Mo., who co-chairs a mayors' task force on hunger and homelessness.

    Read more content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Post-US Iraq: Welcome to Shia-stan
    • Nazi hunters boost drive to find aging war criminals before they die
    • North Korea's heir apparent's hair apparent as fashion hit
    • UN chief defends NATO, calls for action on Syria
    • Rebellious Chinese village under siege by police
    • Iraqis unable to defend their borders as US exits

    2910 comments

    This was set up 10 years ago...we're just seeing it all reach critical mass now. Globalization is slow frying developed economies. Big corporations and the .5% that actually control the world make the money and play everyone else off for a limited pool of jobs. Nations cannot stop this - Big Busines …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: us, mayors, unemployment, poverty, census, middle-class
  • 3
    Oct
    2011
    12:24pm, EDT

    Meet the new roommates: Mom and Dad

    Pew Research Center

    By Allison Linn, NBC News

    The Great Recession appears to have brought families closer together, literally: The share of Americans who are living in multigenerational households has spiked as the economy has tanked.

    About 51.4 million people were living in some kind of multigenerational household in 2009, according to the Pew Research Center’s analysis of the Census data released last month. That’s a more than 10 percent increase from just two years earlier, when about 46.5 million people were living with another generation of their family, according to Pew.

    The percentage of Americans who are living with multiple generations has been on the rise for a few decades, reversing a trend toward living apart that had begun in the 1940s. About 16.7 percent of Americans lived with someone from another generation in 2009, up from 15.1 percent in 2000.

    Pew found that more than half of the multigenerational householdsinclude two adult generations, such as an adult child and his or her parents. The second largest group includes multiple generations, such as Grandma, Mom and Dad and their child. There’s also a small group of households with a skipped generation, such as grandparents living with their grandchildren.

    There are clear financial advantages to living with your family. The Pew analysis found that the poverty rate for families in multigenerational householdswas lower than people in other types of households.

    Send idea Send me your story ideas

    Facebook Follow us on Facebook

    Twitter Follow me on Twitter

    Sharing a household with Mom, Dad or your adult child is an even bigger help if you are out of a job. The overall poverty rate for unemployed people was 30.3 percent, according to Pew. But for people living with another generation, it was just 17.5 percent.

    The spike in multigenerational households also reflects how tough the weak economy has been on younger adults. The analysis found that more than 20 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds were living in some type of multigenerational household.

     Related:

    It’s crowded at Mom and Dad’s

    The high cost of single parenthood

     

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: census, featured, pew
  • 23
    Sep
    2011
    7:20am, EDT

    Good Graph Friday: The commute is a solitary place

    U.S. Census Bureau

    Follow @alinnmsnbc
    By Allison Linn, NBC News

    Apparently, we Americans really love sitting alone in our cars in traffic along with tons of other people who are also sitting alone in their cars in traffic.

    Either that, or we don’t have much choice but to drive alone to work.

    A batch of new U.S. Census data released this week showed that more than three-quarters of American workers commuted to work alone in 2009.

    About 10 percent carpooled, and 5 percent took public transportation. The rest walked, biked, worked from home or used other options.

    Although the number of workers has grown over the past five decades, the pattern of transport hasn’t changed much. The majority have always taken their own car to work.

    It took workers about 25 minutes to get to work, on average, according to the Census data for 2009. That’s a few minutes more than in 1980. 

    Related:

    Yes, your commute is bad for you

    Recession breeds new wave of supercommuters

     

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: census, featured, good-graph-friday
  • 13
    Sep
    2011
    3:11pm, EDT

    Census: It's crowded at Mom and Dad's

    By Patrick Rizzo

    Buried in Tuesday’s report from the Census Bureau on the growth of the nation’s poverty rate was a tidbit that had far-reaching connotations for the housing market and the broader economy:  The kids are still at home.

    The number of households “doubling up” by adding an additional adult who is not in school, a spouse or cohabitating partner rose to 21.8 million in 2010 from 19.7 million in 2007, prior to the recession. In percentage terms, doubled-up households rose to 18.3 percent in 2010 from 17 percent in 2007.

    Apparently, most of the increase came from young people who either never moved out of Mom and Dad’s or moved back in after college because they couldn’t find work. According to the bureau, 5.9 million people age 25 to 34 lived with their parents in the spring of 2011, vs. 4.7 million in 2007.

    Now why is that a problem for housing and the economy? If young people aren’t moving out and forming new households either on their own or after getting married, then they aren’t buying houses and filling them with appliances, furniture, potted plants, cats, dogs and Pampers.

    Related story:

    US poverty rate rises to highest since 1993

    80 comments

    This is normal in most other countries. Only in American do we call you a failure if you live at home with family members. Another way to make people get in over their heads because of peer pressure.    

    Show more
    Explore related topics: economy, real-estate, poverty, census
  • 23
    Feb
    2011
    2:12pm, EST

    The bad job market was good for the Census Bureau

    Carolyn Kaster / AP file

    U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert Groves leaves the home of World War II veteran and village elder Clifton Jackson, 89, in the remote Inupiat Eskimo village Noorvik, Alaska.

    By Allison Linn, NBC News

    The nation’s high jobless rate may be terrible news for the economy, but it provided some unexpected good news for the U.S. Census Bureau.

    Robert Groves, the director of the U.S. Census Bureau, said earlier this week that one reason the 2010 Census cost far less than expected was because the government was able to attract much better workers for its temporary Census jobs.

    "The unemployment rate was so high that we had people working on tasks that we had prepared for folks who have very low skills," Groves told a group at Cornell University last week, according to the Cornell Chronicle online. "We had people who had very good job experiences. ... They finished up all the operations faster than we thought, and better than we thought. So all of our productivity models were wrong, I mean seriously wrong."

    The comments were confirmed by a spokesman for the U.S. Census Bureau.

    All told, the Census Bureau said it saved about $1.87 billion on the 2010 Census. The Census Bureau said the savings were the result of a number of factors, including the more productive workforce.

     

    Send idea Send us your story ideas

    Facebook Follow us on Facebook

    Twitter Follow us on Twitter

    E-mail alerts Sign up for e-mail alerts

    Comment

    Show more
    Explore related topics: jobs, unemployment, census, featured

Browse

  • featured,
  • economy,
  • employment,
  • personal-finance,
  • careers,
  • retail,
  • business,
  • taxes,
  • buzz,
  • cheapism,
  • workplace,
  • consumerman,
  • deals,
  • consumer-news,
  • good-graph-friday,
  • jobs,
  • unemployment,
  • retirement,
  • live-chat,
  • money,
  • career,
  • education,
  • food,
  • real-estate,
  • recession,
  • autos,
  • holiday-retail,
  • women,
  • college,
  • shopping,
  • money-911,
  • facebook,
  • housing,
  • wealth,
  • irs,
  • gas-prices,
  • work,
  • commentid-featured,
  • savings
Also

Top More on TODAY.com headlines

3155,10
Advertise | AdChoices

Allison Linn, NBC News

Allison Linn is the lead writer for TODAY Money's Life Inc. She also writes about the economy, consumer issues, personal finance, employment and workplace issues for NBCNews.com. Linn joined NBCNews.com from The Associated Press, where she mainly covered Microsoft. Previously, she worked at newspapers in Colorado, Washington and Oregon. She also spent nearly two years as a reporter in Germany.

Allison Linn, NBC News Blogroll

  • Career Diva
  • Consumer Reports Money
  • Floyd Norris
  • The Big Picture
  • The Consumerist
  • The Juggle
  • Suddenly Frugal
  • Consumer Reports Baby & Kids
  • The Economist Free Exchange
  • Bucks
  • Brazen Careerist
  • On the Job
Let's socialize!
Want more Life Inc.? Follow me on Twitter, check us out on Facebook or send me your news tips or story ideas.

Patrick Rizzo

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (34)
    • April (66)
    • March (75)
    • February (72)
    • January (74)
  • 2012
    • December (57)
    • November (94)
    • October (75)
    • September (69)
    • August (51)
    • July (58)
    • June (76)
    • May (63)
    • April (62)
    • March (77)
    • February (69)
    • January (48)
  • 2011
    • December (62)
    • November (69)
    • October (63)
    • September (62)
    • August (58)
    • July (54)
    • June (42)
    • May (48)
    • April (43)
    • March (47)
    • February (36)
    • January (43)
  • 2010
    • December (65)
    • November (64)
    • October (51)
    • September (43)
    • August (16)

Most Commented

  • Big Brother may not be watching, but your employer probably is (184)
  • Great Recession will haunt millions into their retirement years, study finds (160)
  • Retirement age in US rises to 61 (from 57 in the early 90s) (192)
  • More brands find it's not a stretch to offer plus-size yoga attire (97)
  • Retired couples will need $220,000 for medical expenses (87)
  • Bus drivers top obese workers list; doctors tip lighter (47)
  • So your kid wants a credit card. What do you do now? (41)

Other blogs

  • Hip2Save

More on TODAY.com

3155,8
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Today.com Money
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise