Jump to February 2012 archive page: 1 2 3
  • It's Leap Day! You may be working for free

    Martin Poole / Getty Images stock

    If you're working for free today, might as well put your feet up.

    If you’re a salaried employee and you’re slaving away at work today, you may be working for free.

    Leap years present an odd compensation dilemma for employees who don’t get paid on an hourly basis. Such workers receive a set salary for a typical year, which is usually 365 days. But there's an extra day this year.

    Alas, for most employers, it doesn’t matter if leap years have 366 days; they still end up paying salaried workers the same amount.

    Does this mean you’re actually an indentured servant on February 29? Employment experts are divided on this question.

    Daniel Schwartz, an employment attorney for Pullman & Comley in Hartford, Conn., believes employers are getting a free day of work out of their overtime-exempt employees.

    “The annual salary is just that, and the paychecks just reflect the portion of the year. Many employers thus get a 'free' day of work from exempt workers because they are not paying anything more than in non-leap years,” he wrote on the law firm's blog this week.

    Others don’t see it that way.

    “It’s all baked in,” said Brue Elliott, the manager of compensation and benefits for the Society of Human Resource Management.

    If you’re making $100,000 a year, he continued, you get paid that over the course of the year, either weekly, bi-weekly, etc., whether you work 365 or 366 days. “Most employers don’t pay exempt employees on a per diem basis,” he added. Typical offer letters to salaried workers don’t specify you’ll be working a certain amount of days per year, he pointed out. They typically say, “you’re paid on an annualized basis.”

    For some salaried workers, the leap year may mean you make more money during this 12-month period.

    According to Michael O’Toole, director of publications, education and government relations for American Payroll Association, 2012 has 53 Mondays. So that means, if an employees gets paid every Monday they’ll get 53 paychecks this year, compared to 52 paychecks in 2011.

    When there are more weeks in a year, some employers reduce a worker’s weekly pay to make it all come out even at the end of the year, he explained. But, he added, “that’s not great human resources relations.”

    Hourly workers don’t have to worry too much about this debate. In the end, they could end up getting an extra day’s pay for an extra day’s work if they work throughout the year and the leap day falls on a weekday, as it does this year. 

    Show more
  • Don't get wrung out: The best budget dryers

    This electric dryer from Maytag sells for less than $500.

    By Kara Reinhardt, Cheapism.com

    Once relegated to basements and other out-of-sight spots, washers and dryers now come fit for display, with front-loading designs, jewel-tone casing, and porthole-style doors. For consumers who don’t want to pay a premium, brands including GE, Kenmore, and Maytag still make standard, non-stackable dryers with square doors. These machines may not come in colors like Wild Cherry Red or Tuscan Chestnut, but they get clothes dry and cost less than $500.

    Dryers come in two basic types: gas and electric. Electric dryers are by far the most common and cost up to $150 less. However, consumers with gas hookups should see enough long-term energy savings from a gas-powered dryer to offset the higher price. (Of course, it depends on how many loads you do and how long the dryer lasts. It costs 15 to 20 cents to dry an average load of laundry in a gas dryer, according to the California Energy Commission, compared with 30 to 40 cents with an electric dryer.)

    Online reviews often emphasize capacity, which measures from about 6 to 7.5 cubic feet for a full-size dryer. Any machine in this range has plenty of room for a full load of clothes. Make a point of choosing a model with greater capacity only if you often launder large items such as comforters.

    Inexpensive dryers feature fewer cycles than pricey models, but they offer at least some basic settings and auto-dry options, which set the machine to turn off when it senses clothes are dry. In the budget sector, these automatic settings typically work by gauging the temperature of the exhaust air. A more accurate method is a moisture sensor, which can be tough to come by in a low-cost model.

    One final thing to note is the location of the lint trap, which can be found either on top of the machine or at the front of the drum, inside the door. This may seem inconsequential, but some consumers who have posted reviews online strongly prefer one or the other, declaring it easier to clean. Remember to clean both the lint trap and the dryer duct for the sake of fire safety and efficiency. These simple tasks can help keep your energy costs down.

    Below are Cheapism’s top picks for affordable dryers.

    • The electric Maytag Centennial MEDC300XW (starting at $448) boasts a 7-cubic-foot capacity, 10 cycles, and a moisture sensor. This dryer impresses experts and consumers with the number of features it offers for the money, including an end-of-cycle buzzer and an interior light. An equivalent gas model, the Maytag Centennial MGDC300XW, is also available, starting at $552. (Where to buy)
    • The Admiral AED4475TQ (starting at $359) is an electric dryer exclusive to Home Depot. It offers 6.5 cubic feet of capacity, five cycles, and three temperature options. Users posting reviews praise its dependable drying performance. A gas-powered version, the Admiral AGD4475TQ, starts at $499. (Where to buy)
    • The Amana NED4500VQ electric dryer (starting at $359) comes with seven automatic cycles, three temperature settings, and an end-of-cycle buzzer. Consumers note how quickly it dries their clothes and praise the capacity of the 6.5-cubic-foot drum. The gas-powered Amana NGD4500VQ starts at $397. (Where to buy)
    • The GE GTDX100EMWW (starting at $386) is a 6-cubic-foot electric dryer with three drying cycles and three temperature settings. This is the only dryer on our list with a lint trap located at the front, rather than on top of the machine. Consumers posting reviews appreciate its reliable performance and interior light. Those with gas hookups can opt for the GE GTDX100GMWW, starting at $450. (Where to buy)

    More from Cheapism:
    Cheap dryers
    Cheap washing machines
    Alternative spring break ideas
    Cheap universal chargers

     

  • Author chats about how companies profit from habits

    Charles Duhigg, author of “The Power of Habit,” joined us for a live Web chat Wednesday to answer your questions.

    Here’s one of his answers to a question from the live chat. (See below for the full Q&A.)

    Jeff asked:

    “Can anyone change their habits? If so, does your book provide all the steps that are needed, or are there certain habits where someone would have to go to a coach or psychologist?”

    Charles replied:

    “The specific steps for changing a specific habit differ from person to person and habit to habit but the steps -- the formula -- is essentially the same, and once you learn it, you can do amazing things.”

    “One of the interesting things about personal finance habits is how many of our financial decisions aren't rooted in decision making, but in habits we've developed over the years. For instance, take credit cards. Lots of people have habits around their credit cards (maybe you do?), and companies know that, and try to encourage some of those habits. That's why, for instance, so many credit card machines are exactly similar from store to store -- companies want to make it easy for you to use your card.”

    If you have a question for our TODAY Money experts, submit it here.

    To sign up for an e-mail reminder for our next chat, click here.

  • 11 offers for free chocolate, business cards, more

    Free seems to be the retail buzzword of the day.

    Companies are giving away stuff — from food to lip gloss — to either get a customer in the door or to get them to sign up for loyalty cards and/or social media accounts.

    Here is a round-up of some of what you can get now, no purchase necessary! 

    IKEA food deals
    Stop by any Ikea on Monday before 11 a.m. and you can get a free plate of scrambled eggs, bacon and potatoes. The offer does not include a drink, but IKEA also offers free coffee to anyone who gets to the store 30 minutes before opening.

    Also kids under 12 eat free on Tuesdays. They can pick from one of three meals: chicken fingers and fries with milk, mac & cheese with steamed vegetable and juice or Swedish meatballs and mashed potatoes and a soft drink. 

    Godiva chocolate
    Join Godiva’s free loyalty program, the Chocolate Rewards Club, and you can pick up a piece of free chocolate of your choosing every month at any Godiva boutique. The card also brings all kinds of rewards and discounts.   

    Vistaprint.com’s business cards
    This company has given away 6.5 billion business cards since it started its free business card offer 10 years ago. Go to the site and choose from one of 30 different designs, use their online design tools to customize your card and they will send you 250 without charge. 

    Amazon Kindle e-books
    The Kindle Owners' Lending Library offers more than 100,000 books that Prime members with Kindles can borrow for free. These e-books include more than 100 New York Times Best Sellers like "The Hunger Games" trilogy and "Water for Elephants."

    Printable Paper deal
    This site allows you to print all kinds of paper — graph, lined, music, ect. — for free. It's such a life-saver for a busy mother! 

    Clarins facial
    Call or stop by any Clarins counter in a major department store and book a "Skin Time" appointment. You will get a free 20-minute customized facial based on your skin needs. Clarins facials at Clarins Skin Spas start at $90 — this free appointment is an express version of that, but uses the same products.

    If someone in your family forgets to wish you a happy birthday, don’t fret! Here is a grouping of companies who will treat you on your special day — all for free!


    IHOP
    Sign up for IHOP’s Pancake Revolution e-club and you will receive three free meals in the first year: one when you sign up, one on your birthday and one on your one-year anniversary of joining the e-club. 

    Each year after that on your birthday, you receive a free Rooty Tooty Fresh ‘N Fruity entree consisting of two eggs, two bacon strips, two pork sausage links and two buttermilk pancakes crowned with cool strawberry topping, warm blueberry or cinnamon apple compote and whipped cream.  Or you can choose another entree of equal or lesser value.  

    Baskin-Robbins ice cream
    Anyone who signs up for the Baskin-Robbins Birthday Club on the website will get a coupon for a free 2.5 oz. scoop on their birthday. Birthday Club members can also get $3 off a Baskin-Robbins Birthday Cake.

    Starbucks
    Activate a Starbucks Reward Card and you're automatically entitled to receive a birthday postcard for a complimentary beverage of your choice.

    Old Navy
    Sign up to receive Old Navy emails and you will be sent an exclusive treat on your birthday — usually a coupon for money to use toward your next purchase. Go here and scroll down to the "Sign up and Save" area.

    Sephora
    Sign up to be a Beauty Insider, Sephora’s loyalty rewards program, and aside from racking up points for every dollar you spend, you will receive a free birthday gift on your birthday. The current gift is a Fresh Sugar Kisses Mini Lip Duo. Just stop into any Sephora during your birthday month to collect.

    Looking for more deals? Check out TODAY's deals and coupon blog, Hip2Save.

  • Smaller companies want workers to shape up

    A growing number of small business owners are taking a page from their bigger corporate counterparts and implementing wellness programs for their employees to curtail ever-escalating health care costs. Employers can’t just force everyone to eat tofu and do yoga, however.

    That’s why Climax Portable Machine Tools based in Newberg, Ore., is taking its time rolling out a wellness program and using a carrot instead of a stick with its 160 employees. The program implemented in the last year is voluntary. Workers are offered incentives, including getting up to $40 back in their paychecks a month, for getting on the health bandwagon. Among the steps being offered are on-site medical screenings, health and nutritional seminars, daily walks and even a company basketball team.

    Climax has seen its health insurance premiums rise as much as 30 percent annually, so a wellness program made sense, said Karen Kinslow, the company’s wellness coordinator. “We really wanted to look after our employees and it really helps the bottom line when you do these things,” she explained.

    More small business owners are realizing the same thing. A recent MetLife survey found 29 percent of small businesses offered some sort of wellness options, compared to 22 percent last year, and 16 percent five years ago.

    Such programs have been shown to pay off for employers. Research from the Partnership for Prevention found that for every $1 spent on worksite health promotion programs, a company can see an average of $3.50 in savings related to fewer sick days and health care costs.  And such programs can be a good thing for employees. An Israeli study showed that employees who engaged in some form of exercise had lower rates of depression and job burnout, according to an article in MyHealthNewsDaily.

    But the strong-arm approach to getting workers healthier can run afoul of the nation’s labor laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA. Implementing employee health programs come with many restrictions under several key laws – the ADA, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

    Under the ADA, employers are prohibited from requiring an employee to take a medical exam, and you can’t require an employee to participate in a wellness program to qualify for health insurance, said Chris Kuczynski, assistant legal counsel, ADA/GINA policy division for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

    When it comes to GINA, he continued, “If you’re going to offer an incentive in connection with a health risk assessment or wellness program, you can’t condition that on whether a person gives you family history or genetic information.”

    Employers can’t have blanket wellness policies, which is where companies get into the most trouble, Kuczynski stressed. If a worker is unable to engage in certain exercises because of an underlying medical condition that is beyond his control, such as a thyroid gland disorder or high blood pressure, employers can’t penalize the employee for not participating.

    Climax has been cautious when implementing methods to encourage workers to participate.

    Kinslow talks to workers individually and helps them come up with other options if they can’t do things like running a 5K. Employees can get points, which translate into dollars, if they attend nutrition or stress-reduction seminars on-site, or even if they take a healthy-eating cooking class. And, she added, some employees may not want their wellness tied directly to work, so they could get points for teaching a karate class to kids, for example.

    When providing rewards there are limits, especially as they relate to health insurance premiums. Companies are increasingly offering employees breaks on their healthcare premiums as incentives to participate in wellness programs, but there are strict requirements under HIPAA on how that can be done. The total award must not exceed 20 percent of an employees total coverage cost. Under a provision in health care reform that number will go up to 30 percent in 2014.

    As far as medical privacy restrictions, health screenings that are done by the employer must be strictly confidential. “They always have to be careful with where data goes and their access to that data,” said Joe Ellis, senior vice president at CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Services, an employee benefits consulting firm. “The employer would never see an individual’s data but they could see aggregate data.”

    Another problem is potential injuries workers could sustain while exercising during work hours.

    Late last year, Ged King, president of The Sales Factory, a marketing agency in Greensboro, N.C., bought four Trek commuter bicycles for employees to use on lunch runs, errands or leisurely rides.

    The bikes are part of a wellness strategy King devised to help his staff of 27 get healthier.

    His plan also includes rewarding workers prizes -- everything from $25 gift cards to iPods -- if they exercise more, including biking, running, or even gardening. “It makes for happier people who are more excited to come to work,” he said about the wellness program that launched last month. “You can’t be creative if you don’t feel good.”

    To deal with the issue of injuries, employees at The Sales Factory were all asked to sign a “Bicycle Release Form” before King purchased the bikes. The release stated that workers were assuming “all personal liability in case of injury”.

    Employees were also asked to promise to wear helmets, which he provided, when they take the bikes out. The goal of the wellness plan, King stressed, “is to make sure we’re healthier.”

  • Confession time: Your worst workplace screw-ups

    A 21-year-old waiter lost his balance while serving German Chancellor Angela Merkel and spilled five icy glasses of beer down her neck and back. TODAY's Natalie Morales has the story.

    We've all been there. You're going about your business at work and you royally screw up.

    Maybe you sent your boss a totally inappropriate email that was meant for your spouse. Or, while giving a presentation in front of a crowded room of co-workers, you realize your fly is open. Or your boss offers you a ride to a conference and you realize about 10 minutes into your car ride that you had stepped in a pile of dog poop.

    All three of the above happened to me. And, trust me; those aren’t even the most embarrassing moments of my career.

    It happens to all of us. And we get over it.

    The waiter in the video above, identified only as Martin D., who spilled five icy glasses of beer down the neck of German Chancellor Angela Merkel takes the cake. But at least he has a story to tell his buddies for the rest of his life.

    Tell us your most embarrassing “oops” workplace story on our Facebook page. We will compile the best stories and share with you. Don’t be afraid to share. We’re all human!

  • How retailers like Starbucks cash in on your habits

    UPDATE: Author Charles Duhigg will join us for a live Web chat Wednesday at 9 a.m. ET. Questions for the author? Add them in the comments below. Click here for an email reminder before the chat begins.

     

    By msnbc.com news services

    News recently that Target had accidentally revealed a teen girl’s pregnancy to her father shows the extremes to which retailers are going to cash in on your everyday habits.

    From brushing your teeth to shopping for groceries, your daily routines are now tracked by giant corporations in order to maximize their profits.

    Charles Duhigg, author of “The Power of Habit,” appeared on TODAY Tuesday to describe how your habits -- and the information you pass on to retailers -- helps big retailers such as Starbucks to make money.

  • Some price comparisons on Amazon are 'crazy'

    Shop the Grocery & Gourmet Food section of Amazon.com and you’ll see amazing discounts. Some items are being sold at 90 percent or more off the list prices. Sounds a bit much, but that’s the power of Amazon. Or is it?

    Check the list prices on some of these items, as consumer advocate Edgar Dworsky did recently, and you’ll find that some of these prices are way out of line.

    Dworsky found Amazon selling 24 boxes of Kraft Macaroni and Cheese Cars Shapes for $32.99. That was advertised as a 96 percent savings from the list price of $791.76. Dworsky went to his local grocery store in Massachusetts and found 24 boxes would cost him only $38.

    A 20-ounce squeeze bottle of Heinz Ketchup was $2.69, but the list price was shown as $47.49. A box of Barilla thin spaghetti was $1.85. The supposed list price was $55.10.

    “It’s just crazy,” Dworsky says. “These list prices were literally plucked from thin air and then multiplied by a hundred.”

    These are not isolated examples. Dworsky says he found hundreds of products that had “grossly exaggerated regular prices.” (Dworsky lists some of these “questionable discounts” in the Mouse Print section of his website, ConsumerWorld.org.)

    I went on Amazon this weekend and had no trouble finding the same “crazy” list prices.  I then went price shopping at my local supermarket to get the ballpark idea of the real selling price.

    Splenda with Fiber

    • Amazon’s price: $4.39
    • Amazon’s list price: $553  
    • Supermarket price: $5.49

    Quaker Oats Old Fashioned Oats (pack of six 18-ounce packages)

    • Amazon’s price: $20.58
    • Amazon’s list price: $211.74
    • Supermarket price: $19.74

     Rice A Roni Beef (6.8-ounce box)

    • Amazon’s price: $1.48 
    • Amazon’s list price: $141.75 
    • Supermarket price: $1.25 (on sale)

    “Obviously no consumer would believe such ridiculous list prices," Dworsky says. "But why would you have these comparisons on the website in the first place if they’re not truthful?”

    Good question -- one I put to Amazon. In a short email, someone in the public relations department wrote:

    “We are working to rectify this situation to ensure accurate savings are listed on all product pages.”

    I’d like to know more. Why is this happening? Why has this been going on for so long? Dworsky reported on the same problem about a year ago.  I sent a follow-up email and am waiting for a response.  

    My two cents
    I don’t know what’s going on here, but it’s not right. In many cases, the grocery items listed on the site are not sold directly by Amazon. So it might be that Amazon is not policing the prices that other companies post on its site. If that’s the case, then Amazon needs to do a better job of monitoring this.

    Whatever the reason, consumer protection laws say “suggested retail” or “list prices” must be realistic and not some made-up figure. Otherwise, the savings are unsubstantiated and the advertising is considered to be deceptive.

    If this is happening on Amazon.com with groceries, it makes me wonder about the ‘list prices’ on other items being sold on the site.

    My advice: Forget about savings claims from supposed “list prices.” Always compare the price of an item at one store (or website) with the actual selling price of other retailers. 

     

  • 1 in 5 older Americans scrimp on health care to save money

    Employee Benefit Research Institute

    According the study, 21.5 percent of 50+ households made prescription drug changes, 19.4 percent skipped doctor appointments and 27.5 percent had difficulty making monthly payments.

    If you’ve ever thought twice about going to the doctor or taking a pill because of the cost, you likely aren’t alone.

    About 20 percent of Americans over the age of 50 are switching to cheaper prescriptions, failing to take the medicine they are supposed to or skipping trips to the doctor to save money, according to a new research from a Washington-based think tank.

    It's the latest example of how high health care costs are forcing some Americans to choose between financial and physical health.

    The Employee Benefit Research Institute used a comprehensive 2009 survey of 4,433 Americans 50 and over to get a sense of how many older people couldn’t afford to get the health care that was recommended to them.

    The survey found that 19 percent said they had skipped or postponed a doctor’s appointment to save money, while 21.5 percent said they had made prescription drug changes to save money.

    The most common approach was the least worrisome: Many said they switched to cheaper generic drugs or used free samples.

    But about one-quarter of those who made prescription drug changes said they’d stopped taking one or more pills. About one-fourth also said they’d split pills or taken a reduced dosage to make the medications last longer.

    Skipping an occasional pill or doctor’s appointment might not affect you much, as long as you are generally in good health. But the researchers found that the people who were most likely to skimp on health care were also the ones who reported they were in poor health.

    Single women and African-Americans were the most likely to report making such changes to save money.

  • We're eating out less, and opting for chains more

    Andrew Gombert / EPA

    Chain restaurants are faring better than indepdendents lately.

    Think of the last time you went out to eat, and be honest: Did you chow down at a favorite locally owned haunt, or opt for the familiarity of a chain restaurant?

    A new report from market researchers NPD Group finds that overall, Americans are eating out less than  few years ago, as the weak economy has caused people to cut back on such splurges. Total restaurant visits have fallen every year since 2008, from 62.7 billion restaurant visits that year to 60.6 billion in 2011.

    The cutbacks have hit mom-and-pop restaurants much harder than chains. The NPD Group data shows that independent restaurants now account for 27 percent of restaurant visits, down from 28 percent in 2008.

    When business falls, closures are inevitable. Although the number of independent restaurants increased slightly between 2008 and 2009, many independent restaurateurs have since had to throw in the towel.

    In the past two years, NPD reports that the number of independent restaurants in the U.S. has fallen by 8,652. In that same two-year period, the number of chain restaurants has increased by 1,750.

  • Health aides, lawyers are most sleep-deprived

    More than half of office workers don't consistently get a good night's sleep

    Home health aides have long had the distinction of being among the lowest-paid workers in the United States, but now it's revealed they also get the least amount of sleep.

    Concern over finances and an overall stressful job may be keeping home health aides up at night; but lawyers also made the list of sleep-deprived occupations. 

    A new study of professions that get the least and most amount of sleep was commissioned by a mattress company and based on a survey done for the National Center for Health Statistics. The research found health aides, lawyers and police officers got the least  sleep, while loggers, hairstylists and sales representatives were the among the most-rested workers.

    “We encourage people to take stock of their sleep habits and make improvements where they can,” said Robert Oexman, director of the Sleep to Live Institute in Joplin, Mo., and a consultant for Sleepy's, the mattress company behind the study.

    Here’s a rundown of the sleepiest workers based on average amount of sleep per night:

    1. Home Health Aides

    2. Lawyers

    3. Police Officers

    4. Physicians, Paramedics

    5. Economists

    6. Social Workers

    7. Computer Programmers

    8. Financial Analysts

    9. Plant Operators

    10. Secretaries

    And here are the workers that get the most shut-eye:

    1. Forest, Logging Workers

    2. Hairstylists

    3. Sales Representatives

    4. Bartenders

    5. Construction Workers

    6. Athletes

    7. Landscapers

    8. Engineers

    9. Aircraft Pilots

    10. Teachers

    Overall, nobody seems to getting a lot of sleep no matter what they do. Even loggers, who topped the list, only clocked an average of seven hours and 20 minutes sleeping, compared with  six hours and 57 minutes for the sleepiest workers, home health aides.

    Related: Home health care industry fights overtime proposal 

    What’s so important about getting enough sleep anyway?

    Turns out, a lot. Two Harvard Medical School studies found that insomnia does a number on your productivity, and a lack of sleep can affect your health. 

    You could make up the difference by napping at work. A 2011 study from the National Sleep Foundation and Philips Electronics found that one in four employees admitted taking a nap at work.

    That study also found:

    • 85 percent of office workers say they could be more productive if they slept more.
    • More than half of office workers don't consistently get a good night's sleep.
    • Two-thirds of office workers surveyed said lack of sleep means their day begins on a low note.
    • Two-thirds of employees do not wake up before their alarm goes off and more than one-third are not ready to get up when their alarm goes off.

     

  • Watch out for online counterfeiters

    Ad space on some of the most trusted web sites peddles expertly-designed, counterfeit products to unsuspecting Americans. But, as Jeff Rossen reports, some say these e-tail giants are profiting along with the cunning con artists behind the fakes.

    Do you think your e-tailer is trustworthy? Think again. There are some sophisticated criminals out there selling their fake goods on reputable sites such as Google and eBay.

    TODAY's investigative reporter Jeff Rossen hunts down the con artists.

  • Con artist took in $359 million with bogus 'free-trial' offers

     A Canadian con artist who made hundreds of millions of dollars selling worthless products on the Internet will need to look for a new line of work.

    Jesse Willms of Alberta, Canada agreed today to settle a variety of false and deceptive marketing charges brought by the Federal Trade Commission. 

    The FTC alleges Willms and his business partners used “Free Trial Offers” to get people’s credit or debit card numbers in order to bill them for products and services they did not want and did not agree to purchase.

    Willms sold dozens of products via the “free trial offer” come-on, including: 

    •  AcaiBurn weight loss products
    • PureCleanse colon cleaners
    • DazzelWhite and DazzleSmile teeth whiteners 

    He also marketed work-at-home-schemes, free credit reports, access to government grants, online consumer research services and penny auction sites (SwipeBids.com and SwipeAuctions.com). 

    In its complaint, the government says these “illegal practices” raked in more than $359 million dollars since 2007 from nearly four million consumers in the U.S., Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. 

    In settling with the FTC, Willms and his 11 companies are permanently barred from using negative-option marketing, a practice where the seller considers the lack of a response from the customer as permission to charge them. 

    They are also prohibited from debiting people’s bank accounts without getting their express authorization, making misleading or unsubstantiated health claims and using false or deceptive endorsements or testimonials. 

    In settling with the FTC, Jesse Willms and his 11 companies are permanently barred from using negative-option marketing, a practice where the seller considers the lack of a response from the customer as permission to charge them.

    A judgment of $359 million will be suspended if Willms surrenders the money in his bank accounts, along with the proceeds from the sale of his house, personal property (including a Cadillac Escalade, fur coat and artwork) and corporate assets. 

    The pitch for everything was basically the same: the product or service was available for “free” or on a “risk-free” trial basis as long as you paid a small fee for shipping and handling. 

    “Get Your Risk-Free Bottle Today,” the bold print would say. “We’ll let you try it, before you buy it!” Buried in the fine print in the terms and conditions was the fact that you were going to be charged almost immediately. 

    “If you didn’t return the free sample within a very short period of time, normally 14 days from the date of purchase, you were not only charged each month going forward, but you were charged for the sample you got that was supposed to be free,” explains Robert Schroeder, director of the FTC’s Seattle regional office which handled this case. 

    Ruth Witteried of Vancouver, Wash., is one Willms’ many victims. She saw an online ad for a “free trial” of a weight loss product called PureCleansePro. Because the ad was on a reputable website, she figured it must be legit. So she agreed to subscribe to a newsletter and pay for the shipping. 

    When her next credit card bill came, Witteried found charges for more than $166, including $59.95 for the PureCleansePro, membership to an acai berry support site and a web access fee. There were more unauthorized charges on her next statement.

    “There wasn’t anything free about it,” she says. 

    The ad promised a money-back guarantee. But when Witteried called customer service, she couldn’t get the charges reversed. 

    “They were not nice. They were not helpful,” she remembers. “They said they were not allowed to give refunds.” 

    Other dishonest sales tactics
    The FTC complaint says Willms and his companies made “false and unsubstantiated” product claims and used “false celebrity endorsements.” 

    Ads for the company’s weight loss products promised rapid and substantial weight loss.  Colon cleaning supplements were touted as a way to help prevent colon cancer. In its complaint, the FTC says these claims were “false, misleading, or were not substantiated.”

    For some health-related products, Willms put bogus endorsements by Oprah Winfrey and Rachel Ray on his website. But neither of these celebrities endorsed any of his products. In fact, Oprah sued Willms for unauthorized use of her name and likeness. 

    The bottom line
    I warned before about “free trial” or “risk free” offers.  They’re designed to make you think you’re getting something for nothing. But if you’re required to hand over your credit or debit card number, for whatever reason, you could be in for a nasty surprise. 

    The Willms organization isn’t the only company that’s used this marketing trick to scam people. He was the largest fish caught by the feds so far, but there are others still out there. 

    Before you take the bait, ask yourself – is it really worth the potential hassle to get a little sample of an unknown product from a company you’ve never dealt with before? I think you know the answer. 

    More Information: 

    FTC: “Free Trials” Aren’t Always Free 

    Read the news release

     

     

  • Facebook profiles predict job success

    If you think just keeping your Facebook page free of drunken photos will help you land a job, think again.

    Facebook facts that make you look worldly and popular may say more about you to a hiring manager than anything else. Photos of your trip to Bali; status updates on how much you enjoyed reading “War and Peace”; and thousands of Facebook friends apparently translate into a job candidate who will do better on the job.

    At least those are the findings of a new study by a trio of universities that looked at how Facebook profiles predict job success.

    “We came up with a Facebook personality score and that correlates with job performance,” said Donald Kluemper, a management professor at Northern Illinois University, who, along with researchers at Auburn University and the University of Evansville, conducted the study that appeared in the recent issue of the Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

    The researchers looked at five personality traits among Facebook users, including conscientiousness, emotional stability, agreeableness, extraversion and openness. The traits are known as the “Big Five” in psychological lingo and are often used in organizational studies, Kluemper said.

    The Facebook users, 56 total, were given a personality score by independent evaluators and six months later those ratings were compared to evaluations completed by the supervisors who the users worked for. And guess what? The higher the Facebook personality score the higher the job performance rating by supervisors.

    So what gets you a high personality rating exactly?

    Here’s how Kluemper broke it down:

    Conscientiousness: This is someone who appears to be well organized and hard-working, and that’s reflected in the way they set up their Facebook page. Maybe there are a lot of detailed posts and profile, or photos of the person working hard at something.

    Emotional stability: You seem to be someone who looks at the glass as half full, and seem able to handle stress. That means your page is lacking lots of negative and down in the dumps type posts; and you’re not overly emotional in images or in what you write.

    Agreeableness: This is all about someone who’s able to get along and doesn’t engage in Facebook conflicts, especially heated debates with friends.

    Extraversion: Here’s where lots of Facebook friends come in handy because lots of friends is a predictor of extraversion. Also, photos of you in social situations with lots of people are a good thing, compared to pictures of you alone on your couch.

    Openness: Travel and intellect play into this category. If you appear open to different experiences and viewpoints, then you’re viewed as open. If you’re posting stuff about classic literature you’ll probably score higher than if you’re dishing about the latest trashy novel. And photos of international travel are also a big plus.

    Based on this research, scoring high in all these categories means you’re more likely to be an ideal employee. That kind of predictor would probably make any hiring manager salivate, especially in today’s tough job market where they have to weed through thousands of applicants.

    Kluemper is not advocating that HR use his groundbreaking social-media research just yet. “This is one study and the sample size is not that large,” he explained. “A lot more studies need to be done.”

    But, he admitted some ill-advised HR folks may try and hang their hats on this one study, and that worries him because using such personality tests could be on sketchy legal grounds.

    Red Tape Chronicles: When it comes to online reputation, 'life's not fair, and companies aren't either'

    Indeed, personality tests and a host of other pre-employment screenings, including everything from criminal to credit background checks, have come under fire when used in the hiring process because of privacy issues and also because some impact certain groups adversely. Social media sites such as Facebook and LinkedIn have even made the problem biggerbecause so much information is now available online that the job seekers themselves put out there.

    “We’re not advocating employers use this technique,” Kluemper said about the Facebook ratings.

    Unfortunately, it may be hard to put the Facebook personality cat back in the hiring bag.

    And speaking about cats, if you want to put those adorable videos of kittens on your Facebook page - a popular pastime for many users - keep in mind what you may be projecting into cyber space.

    Research by University of Texas at Austin psychologist Sam Gosling found that "dog people are more extraverted, more agreeable and more conscientious than self-described cat people."  

     

     

     

     

  • John Schoen offers tips on housing, rates

    TODAY Money expert and msnbc.com senior writer John Schoen joined us for a live web chat Wednesday to talk about the housing market.

    Here is John's answer to one of the questions in the chat and a complete archive:

    One chat guest asked:

    “Good morning John. I am going through a divorce right now and getting ready to refinance the home in my name only. Are there any tips you might recommend or things to watch out for? I am working directly with a mortgage broker because there are so many moving parts.”

    John replied:

    “I would be more concerned with how the refinance will affect your divorce settlement than with getting the best rate or mortgage terms. That’s the limit of the broker’s expertise. They’re not equipped to give advice on the laws governing marital property, which are different in each state. So I would rely on my attorney for advice about how to refinance and let the broker stick to getting you the best terms.”

    If you have a question for our TODAY Money experts, submit it here.

    To sign up for an e-mail reminder for our next chat, click here.

  • Working-mommy myth: They're unhappy

    There’s a dirty little secret working mothers have been keeping: They’re happy.

    A new study found that nearly eight out of ten employed mothers are enjoying being a working parent. So much for the endless talk about working mommy guilt, the mommy track and overloaded mommies.

    According to a poll by Care.com, an online caregiver resource, 78 percent of working mothers say they take pleasure in the daily grind; and 50 percent said that their own career serves as a great example for their kids.

    “Most love being a great role model for their children and many feel more creative and motivated as a working-parent and even feel they add a better perspective at their jobs now that they are moms," said Katie Bugbee, managing editor of Care.com, which polled 1,000 women with children under 18 last month. (There were about 20 million working mothers with kids under 18 in the United States last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.)

    In more working mommy good news, the study also found that toiling moms seem to be finding the support they need at home; and they have big plans for their career futures.

    The study found:

    • 77 percent have a spouse or partner who participates in raising the kids.
    • 89 percent said their significant other supported their career goals.
    • 64 percent said they feel work demands don’t interfere with their ability to be a good parent.
    • 58 percent have a goal to move higher in the professional ranks.
    • 78 percent said they don’t feel they were passed over for a promotion due to lack of work commitment.
    • And 29 percent actually said they fee more productive after becoming a parent.

    The findings weren’t all rosy, especially when it comes to childcare.

    The study found that nearly three out of four companies where the working moms were employed did not offer childcare benefits. And about 39 percent had to miss work during the year because of childcare issues.

     "This survey makes it clear that much still needs to be done in the workplace to support them in motherhood,” Bugbee said.

  • Rock-a-bye cheaply -- the best cribs for under $200

    Convertible cribs like the DaVinci Emily can be turned into toddler beds, daybeds, and full-size beds as a child grows.

    By Kara Reinhardt, Cheapism.com

    Celebrity watchers crave even the slightest bit of news on the baby girl born last month to music moguls Beyonce and Jay-Z. No detail is too small, down to reports that she sleeps in an ultramodern Lucite crib with a $3,500 price tag. Lucky for parents without endorsement deals and top-grossing world tours, high-quality cribs can be had for less than $200.

    Whether they’re made of transparent acrylic or regular old wood, new cribs must conform to standards set in 2011 by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The CPSC requires all models to undergo rigorous safety testing and has outlawed traditional drop-side cribs, which let parents lower one of the rails and lift the baby out. On cribs with fixed sides, the height of the mattress can typically be adjusted depending on the age of the child, so it sits highest for a newborn and lowest for an active toddler. If you’re short or have a bad back, more mattress levels can help ensure you’ll be able to reach over the rail to pick up the child.

    These days, convertible cribs dominate the market. These 2-in-1, 3-in-1, or 4-in-1 models can be transformed into a toddler bed, daybed, and/or full-size bed as a child grows. They generally don’t cost any more than standard cribs, but most require a separate conversion kit priced at $100 or more. Traditional cribs are becoming far less common, although some parents still prefer them. Maybe you have a nursery that’s too small for a bulky bed or plan to have another child right away. You may prefer to hand down a standard crib and buy the older child a conventional bed.

    Few cribs come with mattresses, which can add anywhere from $40 to $150 to the total cost. The standard mattress size of 27 1/4 by 51 5/8 inches works for most cribs, but it’s important to make sure the mattress you choose fits snugly. Test it in a display model at the store or in the assembled crib at home (just be sure you can return it). If two fingers fit in any gaps between the mattress and the sides of the crib, you could be compromising your child’s safety.

    Below are Cheapism’s top picks for affordable cribs.

    • The DaVinci Emily crib (starting at $180) is a 4-in-1 convertible model with a toddler guardrail and sides that serve as a headboard and a footboard when the crib is turned into a full-size bed. Consumers report that it’s sturdy and easy to put together. It comes with four mattress levels and a one-year warranty. (Where to buy)
    • The Baby Relax crib (starting at $169) is a standard crib that’s exclusive to Walmart and comes with a matching dresser. Parents posting reviews like the look of the set and say it’s solidly built. The mattress can be set at four different heights. (Where to buy)
    • The Graco Lauren crib (starting at $135) is a 4-in-1 convertible design with three mattress levels. Reviewers praise its stability and easy assembly and appreciate the bargain price from a leading brand. (Where to buy)

    More from Cheapism:
    Cheap cribs
    Cheap cruises
    Cheap spring break
    Cheap LA restaurants

  • Workers can't sit out of office politics game

    Managers don’t want to engage in it and employees hate it.

    Unfortunately, office politics can’t be avoided.

    The good thing is, many workers realize engaging in office politics on some level is an important part of getting ahead.

    A survey released this week by staffing firm Robert Half found that 56 percent of employees believe being involved in office politics is necessary to get ahead in your career, compared to 42 percent who said it wasn’t necessary, and 2 percent who don’t know either way.

    "There is some degree of politics at play in virtually every organization," said Max Messmer, chairman and CEO of Robert Half International and author of “Managing Your Career For Dummies.” "The savviest professionals practice workplace diplomacy. They remain attuned to political undercurrents but don't allow themselves to get pulled into situations that could compromise their working relationships or reputation."

    Becoming attuned to office politics, however, is easier said than done.

    “The problem with office politics is that it’s not a science,” maintained Margaret Morford, author of “The Hidden Language of Business – Workplace Politics, Power & Influence.” “It’s very much an art.”

    While not engaging in the political goings on at work can hamper your career, she said, making the wrong political maneuvers could kill it.

    There are employees who appear to be great at office politics on the surface because they are good manipulators and have no qualms about stepping on people as the climb the ladder of success, she explained. But, she added, that approach creates a lot of enemies and those individuals don’t tend to stay on the ladder.

    The same holds true for suck ups, she stressed. “It doesn’t work long term.”

    It’s not just the rank and file that must play the political games.

    Managers often try to stay out of the political fray when it involves their underlings, but that’s also a dumb idea, according to an article in the Harvard Business Review by the coauthors of “Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader.”

    The authors, Linda A. Hill and Kent Lineback, write:

    “Unless you reach out, engage others, and create active, ongoing relationships — relationships you sustain even when there's no immediate problem — you will lack the ability to exercise influence beyond your group. And even in your own world, your influence will be limited. If you've ever worked for a boss who lacked any organizational clout or credibility, you know how frustrating that is.”

    For those of you who are frustrated just thinking about how to engage in office politics, Morford has some basic advice: Listen more than you talk, and study what’s going on around you, especially when you start out at an organization.

    Also, beware of the people that want to give you the lay of the land when you take a job. “Don’t accept the first opinion you get on what’s going on,” she advised, adding that sometimes you get the outlier who doesn’t have a clue on the political environment at an organization.

    If you’re still learning the culture or any company, she continued, the best approach is not to challenge coworkers or manager in front of audience, but wait for a private moment and don’t ever say, “you’re wrong.”

    There are three ways people end up stalling in their careers or getting fired, said Morford, when it comes to political missteps:

    1. You’re organization changed direction and they haven’t figured it out or gotten on board.

    2. You’ve run afoul of someone who is powerful.

    3. You haven’t built a wide enough network to support you when you make a mistake.

    Be sure, she stressed, “to walk softly until you figure it out.”

     

  • One in four Americans has more debt than savings

    Many U.S. consumers are so deep in a financial hole that even as the economy begins to turn around they can’t quite dig themselves out.

    A survey by Bankrate.com released Tuesday found that 25 percent of Americans have more credit card debt than they have in emergency savings, and that spells trouble if an emergency situation actually hits.

    Consumers are doing better when it comes to living within their means, said Greg McBride, Bankrate.com’s senior financial analyst. But, he added, years of stagnant wage growth, high unemployment, declining home values and escalating household expenses have strained wallets. “Even though there’s been progress things are still out of whack,” he said.

    And the economic pictures may get even gloomier for consumers if gas prices continue to escalate, he pointed out. Last year, he said, “60 percent of Americans said they cut back on discretionary spending because of gasoline prices.”

    Those hit hardest when it comes to debt versus savings, are individuals on the low end of the economic ladder and those with less education, according to the study that polled more than 1000 adults earlier this month.

    Here are some of the findings:

    • 70 percent of those earning $75,000-plus have more in savings than credit card debt vs. 40 percent of those earning less than $30,000 per year.
    • 64 percent of college grads have more in savings than in credit card debt vs. 46 percent with a high school education or less.
    • 27 percent of Americans report a lower level of financial security now versus one year ago and 24 percent report a higher level.
    • 38 percent of Americans are less comfortable with their savings now compared with one year ago; only 14 percent are more comfortable.

    The overall percentage of consumers who have more emergency savings than credit card debt actually inched up to 54 percent of those polled, compared to 52 percent in the same month last year. But that doesn’t mean people are necessarily more debt adverse.

    “They can’t go spend money they don’t have,” McBride explained, because credit is so tight today, particularly when it comes to consumers who don’t have the best credit ratings.

    A bad credit rating can also create a double whammy for those people looking for jobs because some employers now use credit reports when evaluating job candidates. That’s even worse news for individuals trying to pay off debt.

    High amounts of debt and thin savings have become a fixture in U.S. society. “Over the years, the savings’ needle hasn’t moved,” he said. “From 2007 and 2011, the percentage of Americans with three months worth of expenses in savings, which is not adequate, is unchanged.”

    It’s something we may be used to, he maintained, but “it’s not a recipe for people having a warm and fuzzy feeling about their financial situation.”

     

  • Whole Foods up, Wal-Mart down in customer satisfaction survey

    Getty Images file

    Whole Foods saw customer satisfaction increase in the past year, according to a new survey.

    We’ve been hearing a lot of potentially positive news about the economy lately, and that may be trickling down to the grocery store level.

    A new survey finds that even though food prices are going up, Americans are more satisfied than they were a year ago with upscale grocer Whole Foods and less satisfied with discount giant Wal-Mart.

    The American Customer Satisfaction Index, an ongoing study of people’s shopping preferences, said Whole Foods’ customer satisfaction rose slightly in the past year, continuing an upward trend. It’s the nation's second most beloved major grocery, after Publix.

    Wal-Mart, on other hand, saw customer satisfaction fall. It’s the least popular of the major grocers in the survey.

    David VanAmburg, managing director of the ACSI, said that in general people tend to favor quality over price – except when we experience a downturn as we did with the Great Recession.

    “When the economy tanks, people are thinking more about, ‘How can I stretch my dollar as much as possible?’” VanAmburg said.

    As the tepid recovery has picked up steam, shoppers appear to be starting to look again at factors such as store cleanliness, checkout lines and quality of produce, VanAmburg said.

    “Things have improved enough that customers are looking more for quality. They’re looking for that combination of good quality and good price,” VanAmburg said.

    Consumer prices jumped in January, thanks in part to high gas prices, and food prices were up slightly. But the nation’s unemployment rate fell to 8.3 percent last month, one of a growing number of signs that brighter days are coming.

    A separate poll from Pew Research Center found that people are more optimistic about the economy than they were even two months ago.

    In periods such as this, when the economy is showing improvement and prices are rising, upscale chains like Whole Foods have more tools available, VanAmburg said.

    The store, which some call “Whole Paycheck” for its high prices, can offer promotional deals or tout its private label 365 Everyday Value line, which may make people feel better about shopping there. That can build on what people already think of as a positive shopping experience, he said.

    Wal-Mart, on the other hand, is largely known for being low-cost, and that can make it harder for the chain to find other ways to attract customers when food prices are rising, VanAmberg said.

    Wal-Mart has said it is making a major effort to keep costs down. In its most recent earnings call in November, the company acknowledged that rising food prices are an issue for its core customers and that it was trying to absorb some price increases.

    Wal-Mart spokeswoman Sarah Spencer said she couldn’t comment specifically on the ACSI study because she hadn’t seen it. But she said the company works hard to please customers with such efforts as helping people choose healthy foods and sourcing more food locally.

    “We survey more than half a million customers every month, and they are telling us they are pleased with their shopping experience at our stores and clubs. We continue to work to meet and succeed our customers' expectations by offering them low prices on fresh and packaged food,” she said in an email.

    The American Customer Satisfaction Index is based on interviews with about 70,000 customers annually, gauging opinions on  several different industries.

     

  • Not all coupons you buy online are honored by merchants

    When you buy an online coupon, how do you know a store will honor it?

    Edgar Dworsky walked into Rose's Chinese Restaurant in Waltham, Mass., last week with a $6 coupon he’d purchased for $3 and found out the hard way that not everything is what it seems online.

    The online coupon category is getting more crowded daily. Led by giants Groupon and Living Social, there are now hundreds of smaller competitors. But not every email offering a discount is a good deal.

    Dworsky purchased his coupon from MobileSpinach.com in early February. But when he went into Rose’s, the owner said he’d never heard of MobileSpinach and didn’t plan to honor it. Instead of enjoying a cheap meal, Dworsky found himself in the middle of the messy world of online merchant discounts.


    Dworsky’s tale isn’t unique. Many store owners around the country say they’ve never agreed to accept coupons being offered for sale on MobileSpinach, and the firm has been dogged by nationwide complaints that it is selling allegedly “fake” coupons. 

    The firm’s co-owner, John Vitti, blames the complaints on misunderstandings, poor memories of merchants and over-eager affiliate salespeople, and says he’s happy to issue refunds.  But merchants getting pitched daily by ever-increasing number of Groupon-like sites are often caught in the middle, completely confused by the complicated world of e-coupons.

    Dworsky was equally frustrated when he tried to use his coupon on Feb. 11.

    “The man at the counter, the owner, said he didn't know what this certificate was, that he never agreed to offer these certificates, and that he had not been paid for them. He indicated that someone had come in the day before with one like it also," Dworsky said.

    And while MobileSpinach later agreed to refund the $3 he'd spent on the coupon, he wasn't really satisfied. Calls placed to other nearby restaurants unearthed a similar pattern.

    "This is a scam of sorts ... or a naive company that thinks they can advertise deals that they have not yet formally acquired," said Dworsky, a former assistant attorney general in Massachusetts who now runs the consumer advocate website MousePrint.org.

    Indeed, MobileSpinach has previously been accused of selling deals it didn't really have the right to sell. Last August, San Francisco-area foodie magazine Grubstreet wrote two stories about restaurants and consumers getting tripped up by Mobile Spinach group coupons that weren't authorized. In November, a student newspaper at George Washington University reported the same problemin the Washington, D.C., area. The paper said 50 disappointed consumers were turned away from a small restaurant called Crepaway with invalid $10 vouchers they'd purchased from Mobile Spinach for $5. 

    Other unusual stories dog Mobile Spinach. Jim Gilbride, who owns Old Country Deli in Hicksville, N.Y., told msnbc.com that a caller recently offered him an opportunity to buy a Mobile Spinach ad. He declined, and was surprised when the ad showed up on MobileSpinach.com anyway.

    "I never heard him say (the ad would go up anyway)," Gilbride said. "I dismissed him when he called."

    A man who answered the phone at Kabob Corner in Medford, Mass., said the same thing about a $3 for $6 coupon offered for that store.

    "It is a fake coupon," he told msnbc.com before hanging up.

    Even merchants who have dealt with Mobile Spinach seem to face some confusion.

    At Creative Cakes in Silver Spring, Md., owner Randi Goldman said she agreed to a $5 for $10 in merchandise deal with Mobile Spinach about six months ago.  She generally feels pestered by sites like Groupon and Living Social, and doesn't like the revenue split they offer -- merchants only pocket 25 cents for every dollar in value that is sold. But her Mobile Spinach salesman said she'd earn 100 cents on the dollar for every coupon sold.

    "They said they'd pay me $5 for every coupon, and there was a special deal with the credit card companies who would pay the other $5," Goldman said.  So far, only a few coupons have been redeemed and her PayPal account has been credited the funds, she said.

    Vitti, the co-founder of Mobile Spinach, admits that there have been some customer service issues, but blames them on confusion in the coupon marketplace.

    "This space is getting crowded," he said. "There's just so much confusion. Sometimes merchants don't remember what they've agreed to."

    That's his explanation for Dworsky's issue at the Chinese restaurant.

    “I personally had a conversation with the owner of Rose's Chinese Restaurant and he apologizes for this confusion and so do we,” he said. 

    A worker who answered the phone at Rose’s said the owner wasn’t present and declined to comment.

    Vitti said the rash of San Francisco complaints was the result of a short-term experiment that involved offering deals for sale before they'd been arranged with a merchant. The company later ditched the idea, he said. 

    He attributed the Washington, D.C.,-area complaints to rogue affiliates. Some deals on MobileSpinach.com weren't arranged directly by the Mobile Spinach sales team, but rather by affiliates in a revenue-sharing arrangement.

    "There was confusion because the only way to redeem those was for people to make purchases online, and they were walking into the store with those," he said. "Over time we were getting more and more customer support issues, to a point where we are uncomfortable with them. Sometimes these aggregators and deal providers don't have best relationships (with merchants). ... Sometimes you wondered, ‘Who's got the relationship here?' "

    So as of Feb. 4, he said, Mobile Spinach has stopped dealing with affiliates and will only promote deals sold directly by its sales force. The number of deals being offered dropped from "thousands to about 400" as a result, he said.

    "We are trying to clean up this industry," he said. “There has been many well documented problems in the coupon, gift card and now the deal space with redemption at any size merchant ... even large national retailers.”  

    He said the full value offer to Creative Cakes was real – “customer acquisition costs,” he said – but added that it is only temporary.

    Consumers who feel they've purchased a bad deal from Mobile Spinach should contact the firm for a refund, he said. "We have a refund-anytime, no-questions-asked policy," he said.

    Merchants, however, face a slightly trickier proposition. They can refuse to honor any coupon, but that risks irritating a potential customer. Gilbride, the deli owner, said he'd probably honor a coupon brought in by a frequent customer just to avoid a negative interaction. 

    ”I've been in this business 26 years now," he said. "I try not to get frustrated anymore by any of this." 

    *Follow Bob Sullivan on Facebook     
    *Follow Bob Sullivan on Twitter.
     

     

  • How Target-ed advertising strips away our privacy

     

    COMMENTARY

    Your privacy is gone, and it's never coming back.

    A report that Target accidentally disclosed a teen girl's pregnancy to her father shows the logical extreme to which retailers can take the search for more information about their customers.

    This is what happens when you hand the cashier at your local drug store or grocery store any of a zillion plastic reward cards. Sure you get discounts, coupons or cash back. But you also hand over information that allows the retailer to create a complete personality profile based on your shopping habits.

    That is what apparently happened to an unidentified high school girl who Target identified as pregnant from her pattern of purchases. According to a story in the New York Times Magazine, the girl's father complained about a mailer sent to her featuring ads for maternity clothing and other items that might be needed by a mother-to be. The father complained to Target about the "error" but soon discovered that Target knew his teenage daughter was pregnant before he did!

    In one way there is nothing unethical about Target and other retailers trying to encourage customer loyalty by offering discounts to those willing to scan their card every time they go through the checkout lines. After all, you have to sign up for the card. You have to decide to pull it out whenever the cashier asks if you have a loyalty card. And you are responsible for reading, as I just did for the very first time, the privacy policies of retailers and consumer-product companies such as Dunkin' Donuts, Cabela's, Budweiser and Bayer.

    I picked those four since consumers might not necessarily want others to know about their shopping habits when it comes to items like fattening food, weapons, alcoholic beverages or birth control pills. While each company promises to protect your personal information it is not clear that their promotions or rebates might not alert someone else that you like nothing better than a weekend of donuts, firearms, beer and making whoopee. Moreover, there is nothing to prevent the data they have on you from being sold to other companies that might buy them. Nor is it really clear what steps they take to protect your identity or to minimize the accidental release of information.

    You don’t have to be paranoid to be concerned that privacy left the building long ago. In an electronic era of credit cards, loyalty cards, online banking and website cookies, information about your shopping and browsing habits moves at the speed of light. As soon as you do anything, someone else knows. Retailers and advertisers might know things about you before your family and closest friends do. And the outfit you trust to protect your data can in the blink of an eye be in the hands of another that you may not.

    There is little you can do to prevent this.  Still, retailers owe it to us to do a better job of protecting our privacy. In tough economic times, the vast majority of  consumers will easily sacrifice a bit of privacy to save a few dollars. But as the story of the father, Target and the maternity ads should make very clear, that sacrifice comes at a  price that is poorly understood and can be quite high.

    We should not allow our ability to control who knows what about us to be crushed under a mountain of privacy pledges, security policies and confidentiality riders that are not worth the unread websites and disclosure forms they appear on.  If privacy is to have any future in an age of sophisticated marketing and consumer purchase monitoring it will need far more attention from consumers and regulators.

    Discuss this on Facebook.

     Arthur Caplan, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy  at the University of Pennsylvania.

     

  • What Target knows about you, and perhaps your pregnancy

    Ron Levine / Getty Images stock

    The New York Times reports on what retailers know about your reproductive habits.

    Your favorite big-box retailer may know you’re having a baby before you tell some of your friends and family.

    New York Times reporter Charles Duhigg reports this week that Target has gone to great lengths to identify which of its customers are about to have a baby, based on the items they start putting in their cart.

    The newspaper said the big-box retailer did a detailed analysis of its customers' shopping habits and found out which products they were more likely to buy as they were preparing for a new baby. That allowed them to get a head start on other retailers who may start marketing to Mom and Dad after the bundle of joy is born.

    Why would that be important? Duhigg said new parents are a retailer’s dream customer because that’s a point in time when people’s shopping habits may change, so it’s a good time to snag that customer.

    However, the reporter said the plan initially appeared to work too well. Duhigg recounts how one irate dad came into a local Target complaining because his teenager daughter had received coupons for baby products.

    Turns out, what Dad didn’t know is that his daughter was pregnant.

    Duhigg said the company changed its model somewhat, incorporating baby-related coupons in with other ones so it wasn’t quite as obvious that the parents-to-be were having their baby bump marketed to.

    Duhigg notes that other companies also are taking great pains to understand their customers better, but the Times’ report focused heavily on Target.

    Target told the Times that some of his reporting was inaccurate but declined to offer specific complaints.

    In a statement e-mailed to msnbc.com, Target spokeswoman Stacia Smith said the company is focused on delivering great value and relevant offers, and also respecting shoppers' privacy and operating with integrity.

    “Like many companies, we use research tools that help us understand guest shopping trends and preferences so that we can give our guests offers and promotions that are relevant to them. Guests are always welcome to opt out of our marketing programs,” Smith said in the statement.

     

  • Are you working 11 hours a day? How depressing!

    Researchers in Finland studied more than 2,000 white-collar workers over five years. The results were depressing. WBBH's Nick Ciletti reports.

    People who worked more than 11 hours a day are more were more than twice as likely to be depressed than their co-workers who put in an 8-hour day.

    "There has to be different outlets of enjoyment in a person's life," said Mabel Lopez, a clinical psychologist.

    It's a three-day weekend for many Americans. Get out there and unwind.

     

  • How to get ahead at work: Use an easy-to-pronounce name

    If you’re not getting ahead at work, and your name is difficult to pronounce, you might want to consider changing it.

    New research suggests hav­ing a sim­ple, eas­y-to-pronounce name may help you win allies and favor in the work­place.

    “People tend to feel more positive about things that are easy to process mentally, and with work colleagues that means better relationships,” said Ad­am L. Al­ter, an assistant professor of marketing at New York University’s Stern School of Business, who collaborated on the study with Peter Koval of the University of Leuven, Belgium, and Simon M. Laham of the University of Melbourne in Australia.

    The academics an­a­lyzed 500 first and last names of U.S. lawyers at firms of varying sizes and found that those with names that are easier to pro­nounce­ rise up the ranks of their companies more quickly. The same outcome is likely in other industries, Al­ter said.

    Another facet of the research looked at the name-pronunciation effect for names from a number of regions, including Asian, West­ern and East­ern Eu­ro­pe­an nations. Using a mock ballot with names of varying complexity, all taken from each of the regions in order to avoid ethnic biases, the re­sults suggested that peo­ple with names that are eas­i­er to pronounce are more likely to be fa­vored for po­lit­i­cal of­fice and job pro­mo­tions.

    The re­search builds on an ear­li­er study by Alter that found that companies with simpler names tend to out­per­form si­m­i­lar stocks with more com­plex names on their market debuts.

Jump to February 2012 archive page: 1 2 3