NBC's Diana Alvear reports on a new study from Stanford University that questions the health advantages of organic products over conventional food, showing that there were no specific foods or fruits that display significant differences.
Organic food isn't any better for you than conventional varieties when it comes to vitamin and nutrient content, according to a report released Monday.
The study reviewed more than 200 studies that compared either the health of people who ate organic or conventional foods or, more commonly,
Some critics of the report, including, Chensheng Lu, who studies environmental health and exposure at the Harvard
"If I was a smart consumer, I would choose food that has no pesticides," Lu, who wasn't involved in the new study, told Reuters Health. "I think that's the best way to protect your health."
How about you? Has this report changed your view of organic food?