The employer retirement match appears to be on the rebound

Your future retirement plans may be getting a bit brighter, despite the topsy-turvy stock market.

A new analysis from consulting firm Towers Watson finds that three-fourths of companies that had stopped providing matching 401(k) contributions during the height of the recession have since reinstated them.

A matching contribution generally means that if an employee puts some of their salary away in a retirement account, then the employer will match a certain percentage of that employee’s contribution.

For employees, it’s a good deal because it essentially amounts to free additional money in your retirement fund. But during the recession and aftermath, Towers Watson said about 13 percent of employers appeared to look at it as an extra perk that they could cut to save money.

Towers Watson originally looked at employer matches for retirement accounts back in 2009, as part of a larger study on how companies were responding to the recession. They found that 231 companies had stopped matching retirement funds, and 29 had reduced that benefit.  

The vast majority of the companies who canceled matching retirement plan contributions did so in the first half of 2009.

Then, as economic conditions began to improve, companies started bringing the benefit back.

Towers Watson was able to get information for 205 of the 231 companies that told them back in 2009 that that they had stopped making contributions. Three-fourths of those companies said they’d brought the benefit back.

Towers Watson found that most companies reinstated the match at the same rate they’d offered previously. But about 2 in 10 reduced the amount, and a handful actually improved the matching benefit.

Of the 29 companies who said they’d reduced their matching benefit, Towers Watson said about one-third had returned to pre-recession matching levels.

The sample Towers Watson used came from a wide variety of industries, including manufacturing, health care, automotive and technology.

People.com
5297,5

Discuss this post

People think matching employer contributions are fair but that teachers, who obviously get no employer matches at all, unfairly get pensions for which many pay more into than they pay into FICA.

    Reply#1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 1:50 PM EDT

    Mick you clearly do not understand the difference between a pension and matching 401K. a company matching your 401K has a one time payout to that employee for that year. A pension is paid out till that person dies.

      #1.1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:23 PM EDT

      I know of one school district that provides a pension with funds paid in by both the employee and the school district, and a 403(b) with the school district paying in a match to employee contributions up to a cap. Nice deal if you can get it.

        #1.2 - Thu Nov 3, 2011 10:15 PM EDT
        Reply

        Will match up to 3 per cent, nothing if employee doesn't contribute. In addition, have a defined benefit plan. The company wants to shift money from the pension to the 401K to reduce their risk of refunding the benefit plan which they had to in 2008.

          Reply#2 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 2:50 PM EDT

          I always like asking this question...when did it get decided that the employer who rents your time for less than 1/4 of every month became responsbile for your pension, healthcare, unemployment and workers comp?

          • 2 votes
          Reply#3 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 3:44 PM EDT

          As far as I'm concerned, those things are all part of my compensation package.

          • 2 votes
          #3.1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 5:17 PM EDT

          Ricky. it was decided because sometimes people live longer than employers will employ them and they still need to eat. I hope you don't bother anybody else with this stupid question.

          • 1 vote
          #3.2 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 10:46 PM EDT
          Reply

          When did everyone decide teachers are the 'ENEMY'? And big butt politicians are their friends? Amazing! Simply amazing!

          • 1 vote
          Reply#4 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:07 PM EDT

          Teachers are not the enemy. Pensions are the enemy.

          • 1 vote
          #4.1 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:32 PM EDT

          A.J. s, some people do not understand that a pension is sometimes the incentive needed to keep people from going to work in the private sector for higher pay. Other people put no value on education at all.

            #4.2 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 10:59 PM EDT
            Reply

            10% match on my yearly gross earnings

              Reply#5 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:28 PM EDT

              My company does 12% toward retirement regardless how much the individual contributes on their own. So a person who puts 0% in their 401K or 15% in get the same. One note I should add is that our company is employee owned with about only 3,000 employees.

                Reply#6 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 4:28 PM EDT

                I work for a small city that does not pay much if i had to live with out my other retirements it would be rough , i feel sorry for some of my fellow employees.

                  Reply#7 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 5:18 PM EDT

                  Rick: I always like asking this question...when did it get decided that the employer who rents your time for less than 1/4 of every month became responsbile for your pension, healthcare, unemployment and workers comp?

                  I disagree. I get a pension where I work, but I've been working there 25 years, and hope to work another 5. Our pay is below the industry average, so I see their contribution each month towards healthcare and funding my pension as part of my compensation.

                  • 2

                  • !

                  #3 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 3:44 PM EDT

                    Reply#8 - Wed Nov 2, 2011 7:44 PM EDT
                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.