
Photo courtesy An Te Liu
Artist An Te Liu's monument to the mortgage mess is 36-feet by 44-feet.
Is it a metaphor? An attempt at irony? Or is it art?
According to Canadian artist An Te Liu, his life-sized Monopoly house is all three. Liu believes the mortgage mess "was caused by traders and bankers playing their games on Wall Street, so the common man was squeezed because of that."
So Liu constructed a monument called "Title Deed" to call attention to the crisis. The giant green house, built around a condemned home in Willowdale, Ont., looks nearly identical to the the board pieces of the iconic board game.
"Our homes are not necessarily what we think they are," Liu told the Britain's Daily Mail. "They are property just like in Monopoly to be remortgaged and used as collateral."


Well, here it is boomers! Our retirement property.
Cheeselover, a few points that prob won't bring YOU into touch with reality, but might someone else.
1) Banks can't afford to sit on RE Mortgages for 15 - 30 years; they must, can and do resell them so they can use their money again, at a lower profit (as a percentage of their investment) than a farmer makes selling what he's grown.
2) Because of 1, above, US Banks are at the mercy of Fannie May, who buys the majority of existing mortgages, securitizes them and resells them.
3) Congress pressured Fannie May, in the name of affordable housing, to get the banks to give mortgages to people who couldn't afford them unless the market went up for the whole time they were in the mortgage - leading to the Foreclosure bubble. In '06, over 2/3 of all new mortgages in the US were sub-prime mortgages.A sub-prime mortgage is one where the borrower is a bad risk - in other words, someone who can't really afford the mortgage.
4) Republicans in Congress, not Democrats, began pointing this out in '04. Not strongly enough, and they either didn't trust the public enough, or didn't ytrust the media enough, to try and wake up America, as they should have. But that is a failure to STOP the problem. The Democrats CREATED the problem, and now several million folk have lost a home they bought before they could really afford one THANKS TO THE DEMOCRATIC ACTIONS IN CONGRESS.
By the way, I'm NOT a Democrat or a Republican. Both parties have flaws - but the Democrats policies hurt people more than the Republican's policies do. You don't have to take my word about it - the facts are available, tho you may have to study a little economics to really understand them. I recomend Dr. Milton Friedman.
Friedman is a jerk and his theories are easily and, more importantly, humanely proven wrong. His theories have led to misery on a massive scale. Blindly following Friedman's economic theories have led us to where we are.
Carlos-- Wrong. It was always up to the lender banks to underwrite the risk associated with mortgage lending. Unregulated Wall Street and the too big to fail Banks developed new investment products based on the general concept of mortgage backed securities. The market for these securities grew beyond anyones imagination. When the rich have low tax rates they invest, some would say over speculate. As more and more investor money flooded into the MBS market Wall Street and the Banks actually had to have more product ( mortgage debt ) to meet the demand. Huge mortgage origination firms like Countrywide were encouraged and rewarded for delivering more debt product into this market. Investor demand drove down underwriting standards, Wall Street deluded the rated mortgage pools with lower credit deals, mixing good quality loans with poor quality loans. Derivitives and Credit Default Swaps added to the mayhem. Eventually this house of cards came tumbling down because the Banks had hypothocated these loan pools ten times over. Sub prime mortgage defaults which in a less greedy world would have been relatively innocuous, suddenly poisoned the entire loan pool, and the banks not only had bad loans but alsoi insurance policies against default that also came due. Blaming home owner/borrowers is ridiculous. There was an army of so called loan brokers out there pushing more and more exotic loan products and actually intimidating people into high levels of debt, insinuating that you where stupid if you didn't use leverage to make your fortune in the housing market.
Right-- Merc , as we all know that banks are playing games with peoples having little know how about the mortgage. thay pretend to have no other charges associated with it but its actually not the case so what Carlos said was one side of the picture.
AND IF WE all walk away from our mortgages what less are we teaching future generations? that we are responsible for NOTHING we do? If some one tells you its okay to do something it doesnt mean you should do it. and what are we doing to our economy? everyone who stops paying their mortgage stops paying the taxes that are needed to keep our towns running? will they complain when their roads are unpaved or their garbage is uncollected? when the police dont come to their house because there are fewer of them? our ny govenor will eliminate 800 jobs this year to close a budget gap. why? because NO ONE is paying their taxes.
They are not paying thier because they can't find a job with high enough wages to pay them. Try to pay taxes on 7.80 an hour and still eat.
Hey Joanne-
I agree with you, but the problem today isn't people walking away from their mortgages or refusing to pay their taxes. The problem now is people losing their houses because they have lost their job, or they (or a family member) have suffered a serious illness that their healthcare doesn't cover fully, or they don't have healthcare at all, because they couldn't afford it.
Today's victims are collateral damage, innocent bystanders so to speak who have been caught up in events beyond their control.
Not to worry-the bottom props up the top and they too will fall and they lack the basic skills to perform meaningful work. It will be fun to watch them lose all to Goldman Sachs!
NOBODY making minimum wage is paying on a mortgage to begin with.
I think the House is cool, but the statement needs work. This is stupid liberal garbage. The mortgage crisis was caused by failed fiscal policy of Liberal governmental bodies like the Democratically controlled US congress, not by Wall Street. The games Socialists like then Senator Barack Obama, Barney Frank and their ilk were playing have proven much more serious and dangerous to the world than Wall Street could ever be. Captialism is far and away the best form of government and that has been proven everywhere it's been tried. It only fails when hampered by socialist/commununist agendas that, while touting to make the game fair, actually remove the protections that were already in place to begin with.
What are you smoking "smarter?" I am sure that you are also a strong believer in trickle-down economics and tax cuts for the wealthiest. Ask most economist, (not Fox News ones, those don't count) these programs have never worked. BTW, both parties are to blame for this mess and the rest of us have paid the price.
I love reading Republican revisionist history.
Smarter -- please define "socialist" and "communist" and then show proof as to how to apply those terms to the people you so label.
Otherwise, it's merely sheeple rhetoric.
smarterthanthou-2572543-
Have you been asleep for the past 20 years? The financial crisis was caused by one thing--rampant banking deregulation and weak oversight. These are key platforms in Conservative/Republican ideology. If you don't know that, then you know nothing whatsoever about how we got to where we are today.
BTW, capitalism is not a form of government. It is an type of economic process. You didn't know that?
You poor thing. The banks, oil companies, and insurance companies are bending us over, and picking our pockets while they do it. At least I know it's happening. You actually seem to like it. You're a corrupt CEO's gold pinky ring.
Dear Smarter,
Your comment is as Republican as they come (Think Union of Soviet Socialist Republic!).
"Captialism" [sic] is not a form of government (neither is Capitalism).
There used to be a rule of thumb for mortgages: You can afford a house that costs as much as you make in ONE YEAR (Now, I said AFFORD here, not scrape by and pinch every penny to make ends meet, and put your groceries on VISA to get by!). Blame whoever you want, I say that common sense took a long vacation; my Depression-era Grandma would have called me an idiot if I even thought of a 5-year, balloon-payment mortgage "product"!
You are absolutely correct Smarter.
It really is amazing that the incredibly stupid would think that they could leverage their crappy little paychecks into a lifestyle that they didn't deserve by buying a house.
Now they are all looking around for a bailout and someone else to blame for their own pathetic situations.
Oh yeah. The house is cool even though Liu is an idiot.
Do you ever get a nose bleed sitting so high on your pedestal?
totally "dumberthanthou"-what an idiot!
The failure was caused by derivatives that have very little to do with the government and everything to do with Wall Street. You should go back to school!
What does a rule of thumb for mortgages have to do with anything? It seems you would like to blame everything on over buying which just isn't the case. I know lots of people that earned twice in a year what their houses were mortgaged for and they have spent two years under employed after graduating from college with masters degrees. You may be on drugs! The mortgage problem started when banks started what they call risk management using derivatives as a tool to spread risk. When they found out how easy it was to bilk the system they went hog wild. When they failed they knew they had the tax payer to prop up their 100 million a year salaries. Look at AIG and their over inflated bonuses this year AGAIN. They can't pay their bills or their employees but they sure have enough to get a few hundred million! How pathetic. How pathetic anyone would even believe the cause was sub prime mortgages when they only account for less than 1% of the loss and most of them wouldn't even be there if they still had a job to pay them!
Remember when Bush bailed out United's pension plan? What was it 75 billion. Shortly afterwards the CEO gave himself raise from 7 million to 35 million a year. On top of that he made all the employees take cut backs in pay and benefits. Hmm must be nice to have corporate priviledges with tax payer's money!
The old rules of finance still apply. If you were foolish enough to play the "flipping" game or if you treated your house as a ATM, then you probably got caught up in the mess. If you were wise and could see the insanity for what it was and stayed out of it, then right now you're just fine. There are people that pay off their mortgages and own their homes free and clear. THAT is the key to future financial security: YOU completely owning your home (and not the gov't, nor the mortgage company.)
Regardless of your housing situation, if you are still carrying a balance on a credit card, you still don't understand the rules of finance. Get educated or stay poor.
middleroader12-
It's not that simple Middle. The majority of forclosures now are the result of the owner losing his/her job, and/or a healthcare issue. It doesn't matter if you own your house, if you have lost your income and/or if you suffer a serious illness or injury and you can't cover the healthcare costs, you are going to lose your house. And as I said, those are the main reasons for foreclosures today.
Hey, I did it right, and so far, I'm okay. I bought my house 13 years ago, and I've got seven years left on my mortgage. I paid 1/3 down, and my house was well within the amount someone in my family's income bracket can afford. We even add a little extra to our monthly payments to knock down the principle a bit and we hope to finish up a year early.
A few years back, my wife went on disability. It was a hit, but we had planned ahead for this type of thing, and I'm the primary breadwinner anyway. I have a good job, and good healthcare. W don't carry a balance on our cards, and we have only one, very modest car payment. So, I would say that even with my wife on disability, our finantial situation is more stable than most.
Now, I don't think I'm going to be laid off, but who can say in this economic environment. If I do get laid off, we might very well be toast. It would be touch and go, especially if I am unable to get work after the unemployment runs out, and that's happening all of the time. Also, I'm 60, not the optimal age to find work in an environment sucha as this, All my best laid plans, and a couple hundred thousand dollars worth of equity will fly out the window.
I don't think the old rules of finance apply, at least not at the moment. The economy has done things we haven't seen since the great depression. I agree, a lot of people were stupid and overextended themselves. But most of these folks were culled from the pack a year and a half ago. By contrast, most of the people that are getting hammered today did things right, and then became victims of economic factors that were beyond their control, and beyond anyone's expectations.
Oh, one last thing. I believe it was Wells Fargo that announced today that in fact they had foreclosed on something like 45,000 homes that they should not have this past year--they screwed up the paperwork. That's just one bank.
uh,,,,,,,,,you have a crappy little house that you bought 13 years ago, that will still be a crappy little house in 13 more years from now and will have paid countless repairs, taxes, congratulations
There are people who pay off their homes only to pay property taxes 4 times what the original mortgage was. What are you smoking?
Middleroader, you got it half right. Many of us have been mauled by this economy even though we saved, lived within our means, and stayed clear of the mortgage industry's shenanigans.
I don't own a house, but I pay my rent in full, on time, every month. Yet, I am moving for the second time in a year, because some a$$hole landlord decided to pocket the rent instead of paying the mortgage. I blame scumbags like these for the financial meltdown.
I believe you are missing the point Joanne. The problem is: Morgages are given to people who have no business buying because they are financially unstable. The trend is SPEND other peoples money. Crash! no job, no money... now we have financially unstable people and financially unstable governments. And, to stray from the topic. Parents, your children do not need all the latest gadgets!!! The next generation is all about keeping up with the joneses. No wonder our economy is unstable. Stop blaming corporations for your financial ignorance.
Tanya, please see my post above. The people losing their houses today are the victims of job loss and/or health issues.
One thing I didn't mention. My friend was laid off a year ago last January. He was blind-sided. His wife was laid off last spring. A month ago, he finally got a job and beat foreclosure by a month. He was out of work for 18-months. His wife is still out. It ate up all of his savings, his two kids' college funds, and now he's in up to his neck. If he gets laid off again, which can certainly happen in this economy, he's toast.
How many families that you know, could be out of work for 18-months and still not lose their house?
Sub-primes had nothing to do with the mortgage meltdown. Can you say derivatives? I think ya can. Now go look it up on the Internet!
mandt,
That is unfortunate. But, life is not fair. Sometimes bad things happen to good people.
Art is beautiful, and of course, subjective, but it annoys me when people make garbage like this and call it art or a political statement because they need attention. I'm glad this thing isn't in my neighborhood.
Thank you smaterthanthou-257243 - couldn't have said it better. Besides, do all of you who took the interest only mortgages really think you "lost" your home? You didn't lose your home, you lost your lease, you had no collateral in the home to begin with. Next time, understand that there is a personal responsibility to ALL that you do. I'm sorry so many children are/were hurt by the mistakes their parents made, and I'm sorry for all the people who lost their jobs and therefore lost their homes.
Right on Joanne. While it's easy enought o simply blame the banks, why is it that so few accept responsibility for their role in putting themselves in this mess? I lost my job and was out of work for 7 months. During that time, my wife/I still made all of our payments and even continued to grow our savings off a single income. How? We budgeted wisely in the first place and didn't max out what we could afford. We also didn't sign on for an adjustable rate mortgage that we could barely afford at a stupid low interest rate. That said, we still have a beautiful 3-bedroom, 2.5 bath, 1,800 sq. ft. newly built home on 1/3 acre. People need to realize that "middle class" doesn't mean owning 4-5-bedroom homes on 3 acres. Shame on the banks for enabling people to do this to themselves, but it ultimately comes down to the simple fact that most people did this to themselves by not being intelligent enough to think and ask the question "Can I really afford this home?" instead of asking the bank "Will you give me enough money to get this?".
i think your type and many other americans are the problem with this country along with white supremisists and gangs. i myself am payng for my houses mortgage and its probably a better house than yours and yet im treated in the street like a loser mexican just because the way i look. so i think untill your kind can get along with my kind we can further prevent future generations from making the same mistakes.
Actually Obvious, you are partly right. I have no cash. What I do have however, is a paid off 5 bedroom, 3 bath double wide on 2 acres of land. It is paid off because of several factors.
First, we blessed by our almighty Lord.
Second, when we sold our farm in Arizona (after giving my ex-wife half the money) we used what proceeds we had left to buy our home cash, pay for the moving expenses across to South Carolina, we paid for a used vehicle which we still have with almost 227,000 miles on it and we paid for a small vending business. When the business failed about 2 years ago we still had everything and no opportunity for anyone to take from us.
How did we get the farm? We worked hard and saved up enough money to buy 20 acres of plain desert land cash. We paid for a well. My eldest daughter (she was about 14 at the time) and I dug a 330 foot trench for the electric and telephone lines and had then inspected before we covered them. My friend and I put the septic system in ourselves and had it inspected before we covered it. We paid cash for a 29 year old mobile home. It was a terrible thing but we were blessed to have it. It kept the sun off of us in the summer and kept us almost warm in the winter. It kept us dry during monsoon season. We used a wood burning stove to keep warm and dealt with the summer heat instead of running air conditioning.
Oh yes, and we raised much of our own food. We raised and killed our own pigs, chickens, ducks and goats. We went fishing and caught fish to eat as well. We had our own garden.
We raise much of our own food now as well. Our youngest child is 7 and she has been helping my slaughter our animals for about 4 years now.
Third and finally, my parents raised us up to know responsibility and the importance of a strong work ethic. What many today refer to as "anal retention" I still refer to as "attention to detail." It used to be required for a job; now it is to be made fun of. My father went to work every day, regardless of whether his bad back ached him or if he had a headache. If his car broke down he fixed it himself. I am still impressed that my dad rebuilt a motor in our old Ford Falcon station wagon after he got home from work on a Friday and drove it to work on Monday. He did what he had to do and he taught us well. (THANKS DAD.)
For your information, we are not talking about the 1930s here; I am only 50 years old. I grew up on Long Island where most people would not know how to live without every luxury. People panic today if they cannot have satellite TV.
Yes, there have been many times we went without some of the wants in life and there have been times when my children have gone without some of the wants in life, but non of us ever went without the needs in life. We had food, water, clothes, education, Christianity and love. I always told my children that the good thing about living the way we did and do is that if the whole system crashes, we will not have to change our lifestyle very much.
We buy what we can afford when we can afford it and we do not go into debt to live the 21st Century lifestyle.
I wish more people would learn to live like that; the times are coming when we may have no choice.
By the way; the 5/3 I bought was a foreclosure. The original owner thought it was more important to continue paying off his Cadillac instead of his home. I bought it from a flipper for about $50K. I am still doing work on it since the owner (of the Cadillac) did a lot of damage to it when reality hit him.
I am not bragging; I am actually blessed for all the reasons I stated above.
I thought my husband and I were the only ones who lived this way. We too live on a small farm (25 acres) with a crappy singlewide on it. We pay everything in cash no credit. Our land is paid for. We are building a new home with cash and we should be in it by summer 2011. We built everything ourselves right from the logs which came from our property. We grow our garden and spend hours canning in the fall. We live totally off grid by using solar and wind power. Also we have no need for a brand new vehicle. I couldn't fathom buying a new car and financing it. Our tractor is run off of bio-fuel that the local restaurants give to us. It takes alot of hard work but the piece of mind of not owing the banks anything is priceless. We do not lack for anything.
What "type" is Obvious? The type that pays his bills and doesn't overspend? How is that a problem?
BTW: You might consider you get treated badly because of your assumptions of other people -- not because of "your kind" -- whatever that "kind" might be.
So fred pretty much capitalized on someone elses misfortune? Yes, hard work, living within your means is great. My family lives that way too. But I am also not foolish enough to think that if I live "right" nothing will ever happen. Not everyone who lost their home lost it due to irresponsibile spending habits. Sometimes all it takes is an accident, an illness, the death of a spouse, a lost job. To put everyone in one group-point a finger and say "see you shouldn't have been so greedy" is unfair.
Hey freddy for congress.
hey dumbass you didnt give your exwife anything, her half was already hers, no wonder she dumped your duffus dumb ass
Gerald, I didn't take advantage of someone's misfortune; they over-extended because they wanted the big home and the Cadillac but couldn't afford both. The established their priorities and chose the Cadillac. They made the choice. They chose to live beyond their means and when the pressure caught up they chose the luxury over the necessity. Someone was going to buy the property; why not someone who worked and saved and didn't live beyond their means? I am not finger pointing at them; I am saying that there is the possibility of doing things in such a way that you don't end up in the situation many others are in.
There are many people who had no way of knowing things would be like they are today, but the people who lost this place did not lose their jobs; they really had the attitude they were entitled to everything while making closer to nothing.
Lastcall- It looks like someone is a little touchy; is it because you can't find a wife or because you are such a bitch your wife has convinced you that you are absolutely worthless?
You don't know me and unless you know my ex-wife and who paid for what, you would be best served to shut up. In fact, if you knew my ex-wife, what type of person she is and who paid for what, you would know that you should shut up.
thats funny, "you don't know me" what episode on Jerry Springer did you star in?
Look at the new welfare housing! Reagan For President!
Under Reagan welfare roles increased to an all-time high of 27,000,000,000.00
Under Clinton that was reduced to 17,000,000,000.00
Is that some kind of sucess for Reagan?
I suppose you think the gas shortage occurred under Carter too! uh 1973
I am so very tired of the "Liberals-Socialists-Democrats" comments. The housing crisis stems from pure greed. Greedy Republicans, greedy Democrats, greedy conservatives, greedy liberals, greedy Wall Street. It is that simple!
Amen, and preach on, because no one who mentions "liberals" or "conservatives" seems to be intelligent anymore. Those people just want to pick a fight.
No one in the private sector was complaining when they were all making money flipping homes, living beyond their means, and trading up for more expensive homes every 3 years. Then the inevitable happened, and they all pointed their fingers at the politicians, bankers, and Wall Street.
Everyone was to blame, public and private. We all need to look in the mirror and stop being in denial, so that this fiasco will never happen again!
Absolutely correct. The greed of human-kind will be it's down bringing. Lets hope people realize it before it is too late.
I blame global warming.
OH Gees What Now,
And lots of ignorance.
Carol,
Me too! But first we must blame Bush!
I am so truly tired of the "Liberals-Socialists-Democrats" comments. The housing crisis stems from pure greed. Greedy Republicans, greedy Democrats, greedy conservatives, greedy liberals, greedy Wall Street. It is that simple!
smarterthanthou-2572543
it was the fault of a combo of wallstreet ,conservatives & worthless liberals.
because in this country everyone worships the white-mans god (money),
also all career polititions should be shot!
"White-man's God", You may be smarter than me, but you are also a racist!
mbunch, Shooting the politicians is probably going too far, but in any discussion about the crisis we do all have to work together to prevent something so disastrous from recurring. The very best thing to do is to VOTE the slackers out of office, and begin a highly organized effort to bring about term-limitation legislation. All the things that this country so desperately needs can only be brought about by the efforts of the average citizens. This does mean getting off of the couch, going door to door, organizing the community, staging rallys, giving up a few beers, and number one, TURNING OFF THE FOOTBALL GAME! Each person needs to decide for her/himself what is the most important way to spend their time. So far, we are all aware of what the majority continues to choose. You cannot get something for nothing. Period.
White man? You should wake up and smell the coffee! Only a select few are in the money scene and they make hundreds of millions a year for doing essentially nothing. They may be white but the are also other things. They also promote racism because they benefit by it while the middle class disappears!
Justiceprincess you hit the nail on the head. I have been telling people that we need term limits in congress for years. Most of the people I have talked to about it agree, but think it would be too hard to get them instituted. The whole financial mess, (housing, credit, auto) was brought on by our own need for self gratification. As long as we were getting the best car, the biggest house, or the biggest TV we were happy with the way things were. I remember telling one of my coworkers five years ago the housing market was going to pop. He said no way it would never happen. Guess who was eating humble pie now?
If the banks didn't have the freddie and fanny to sell the mortgages to the whole mess would not have happened. You can thank Barney Frank and Cris Dodd for that!
If the banks did not create the loans for fanny and freddie to buy then there would not have been a mess as you say.i guess the answer would to get rid of both.
Tanya, absolutely. People were giving me crap because I didn't go to law school, and they were giving me crap because I didn't buy a house. There's no reason to feel self-righteous, though, because banks did give out the loans and they did give themselves bonuses for piling up bad loans.
"Joanne" sounds like a bankster thief..
No "Joanne" sounds like a RESPONSIBLE person. Something that is completely forgotten in our society. Let's just blame everyone else for our own problems. Yeah, I understand, people get themselves in holes or dilema's. BUT when you buy a 500,000 dollar home and can barely afford the freakin shoes on your feet because you strapped yourself to the gills, don't come a crying to everyone. People need to think, what is priority here and be responsible adults.
Yet, if no loans had ever been giving to individuals without income verification, or substandard credit ratings, none of this would have been able to transpire to begin with. There would have been no "bad loans" to bundle and trade. Hmmm... so yes, it WAS all about greed. All the way from the top to the bottom.
BTW... simply having a home LOAN does not make one a "home owner". It is the BANK giving the loan that owns the house until the mortgage is paid in full. So people who are being forced into foreclosure are not "home owners". They are mortgage owers.
Don't buy more house than you can afford, expect it to DECREASE in value in the short term along with interest rates to rise (if you were stupid enough to get an ARM or Interest Only loan) and pay enough down so that the monthly mortgage payment resembles rent on an apartment.
Ironically... you'll probably end up with something resembling the photo for your FIRST home... but you won't lose it!
The banks gave loans to credit risk people. Then they put all the loans into one big bundle and lied about it's value to international banks. The IB's purchased massive home loans not realizing the 'con' that had been put upon them.
It's greed pure and simple.
If you think its over - think again. And if you think the Dem's 'created the problem' really think ALSO. I can concretely track the biggest problems to the Republican watches - but you all think what you want - 20 some odd years of honest work as an appraiser and I QUIT rather than be part of what I louldy predicted in public forums (and started going after the boss folks at the GSE's about) over 10 years ago. Only thing I can say is it took longer than I thought to implode, and my predictions are for 'longer than ANY of the officals think' for even a partial the cure/resolution! But no one listened the first part - Shrug- why would I even think anyone would listen to my solutions for avoiding the 'near inevitable continuation of chaos' which will ensue unless practical and pragmatic solutions are emplaced?
Here's what I want all of you to do.. Go to a store and buy one balloon. Take it home and blow as much air into it as you can. Then, when you think the balloon has all the air into it that it can hold, just keep blowing more air into it just to see what happens. This is what happened in todays economy, plain and simple. I don't feel sorry for those who keep blowing air into a balloon that is already over inflated. Now, who do we have to blame for this? Everybody.
Really? Some people on this thread seem to "get it" others are way too busy playing the blame game. This whole problem is our own damn fault. People bought more then they could afford. When they realized they were in over their heads they walked away. Thus, bringing down the value of their neighbors houses. For the record the two on my street one was a Republican the other a Democrat. Until we actually pull our heads out of our A$$, we are going to continue to go in this spiral.
Take a look around everyone is complaining about everything and doing nothing. This problem was not created in the last two years it was years in the making. It was greed pure and simple, but not just corporate greed. Our greed, we have to live in the big house and drive the fancy cars.
Also, calling people names is not productive and it really doesn't bring anything to the discussion.
The downfall of the housing market fall squarely on the shoulders of Phil Grahm former REPUBLICAN Congressman from Texas..
Read about the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999) which removed all barriers instituted by the Glass-Steagall act of 1933..
Lets see who controlled BOTH the House and Senate in 1999?
Don't know here is a big hint .....REPUBLICANS !!!
So tell me how is it the Democrats fault?
Know what you are talking about before you repeat the propaganda you have been listening to
Robert, finally someone posts that can actually read! These people believe whatever they are told!
The downfall of the housing market fall squarely on the shoulders of Phil Grahm former REPUBLICAN Congressman from Texas..
Read about the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999) which removed all barriers instituted by the Glass-Steagall act of 1933..
Lets see who controlled BOTH the House and Senate in 1999?
Don't know here is a big hint .....REPUBLICANS !!!
So tell me how is it the Democrats fault?
Know what you are talking about before you repeat the propaganda you have been listening to
Why does everyone say it's Barny Frank and Chris Dodd's fault.
The GOP had the white house and both houses of congress for 6 years, if they knew this was a problem, they had the votes to fix it. If they knew it was a problem and DIDN'T fix it, they are to blame.
me-2013484,
Because we were tired of everyone blaming Bush!
Of course it's not Chris Dodd and Barney Frank's fault. How could it be? They never really did anything any way, they're Democrats, they never do anything wrong.
Seriously, everyone knows that it was really Bush, Cheney and Reagan's fault. It always is. Monica Lewinsky? Why it was Bush/Cheney/Reagan who put her up to it. 9-11, again, Bush/Cheney/Reagan's fault.
There, isn't that easy! Doesn't everyone feel so much better?
OK, Democrats, you can relax now. Obama will fix it, he's the best!!! Remember the "Change", isn't that enough? All we need to do is raise taxes on the rich, they're evil, right? It's there fault too! Hey, raise taxes on everyone, we just need the Government to spend more money. I heard that if the government spent enough money, we all won't have to work anymore!!
Hey, I've got a great idea! Let's pay for health care for everyone! We can have the rich pay for everyone too!
Woo Hoo! What a Great Country!!! Man, that was the best kool-aid I have ever had!!!
You are forgetting about property taxes. The Government will never let you own property "Free and Clear". I have owned my home (paid-off) for 6 years and I pay $2498.00 in property taxes to the government. When I die my children will have to pay. The only way you can own property "Free and Clear" is to move to another planet.
Don't want to pay property taxes? Fair enough. Then get out there and clear the road when it snows, bury your trash in your backyard, pay for private schools, hire an armed guard to protect your house instead of the police, whip out your garden hose in the event of a house fire, etc.
not true ! they are tying to get there to set up a goverment to make you pay for when you get there !!!
lol
moving to another planet wont work either --lol only certain thing "death and taxes !!!!! "for life"
Even Alan Greenspan said his idea of capitalism was wrong, it wasn't liberal socialism that did anything, it was deregulation of the banks and wall street. Deregulation, small government, very conservative ideas. Our economic boom in the Years after WWII was due to all global competition having been destroyed during WWII. That's why capitalism worked than, before super companies dominating the market and foreign imports started coming in. When the banks took over this countries government in the 80's ,with the Reagan Administration, they slowly destroyed our industry and deregulated themselves so that they could take the high risks through bad loan services for the housing market and extremely high risk derivatives on wall street. In doing this when the banks started to fail they brought down the whole country raising rates and putting people out of work and home. And our government run by the banks was quick to bail them out, twice, both republican and democrat run. They made it so businesses couldn't get money to pay their employee's and people couldn't pay for their homes.
cmharmon,
yea, I heard Castro said the Communism was the wrong solution and Europe is having some real problems with Socialism.
Hmmmm, what to do...